TheMaritime.net
Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%
Oil or Chemical Tanker🇩🇰 DenmarkActive

TORM DURGA

Built by HD Hyundai Mipo in 2014

IMO
9682382
MMSI
219647000
Call Sign
OVJZ2

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage
29,553GT
Deadweight
49,680DWT
Length Overall
183m
Beam
32.2m
Draught
11.8m
Year Built
2014

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value
$33.7Mrange $26.9M$40.7M
$679/dwt · 49,680 dwt · built 2014
high confidence · 54 comps
Comparable sales
SILVER HAGUE 2015 · $42.5MSILVER ROTTERDAM 2015 · $42.5MCL HUAIYANG 2017 · $30.8MCL FUGOU 2017 · $30.8MSILVER CARLA 2014 · $42.5MSILVER MONIKA 2014 · $42.5M
Second opinion±27% typical error
$37.5Mrange $29.6M$38.5M

An independent cross-check of the estimate above for Tanker (segment · size · age · market).

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Risk scoreLow
84/ 100
Safety78
Compliance95
Environment78
Carbon intensity · estimatedA

This ship has no verified emissions report. We estimate a band A from its segment, size and age (65% confidence).

Estimate, not a reported figure. Within one band 95% of the time on reported peers.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

27/100
Moderate riskLow confidence40% component coverage

Some elevated factors — typically age or a lower-graded flag — but no acute ship-specific flag.

PSC detentionsno data
Sanctions exposureno data
Dark-fleet signalno data
Hull age28
Flag register25

A coverage-weighted blend of the 2 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. This headline is flagged low-confidence (a thin or structural-only read) and should not be treated as a verdict. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtHigh confidence
~49,680t at summer draught

Tanker · summer draught 11.8 m · 53 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught
8.26 m~30,906 t
8.85 m~34,035 t
9.44 m~37,164 t
10.03 m~40,293 t
10.62 m~43,422 t
11.21 m~46,551 t
11.8 m~49,680 t

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (hull geometry) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classification
Declared
Tanker
Inferred from size
Tanker

density DWT/GT=1.68 is consistent with declared tanker

DWT/GT 1.68Beam/LOA 0.176Declared type: Oil or Chemical Tanker

Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Commercial

Voyage Estimate

From 49,680 DWT · ~30 t/day · bunker @ live VLSFO.

Fleet Management

Ownership & Management

Explore More

Similar Vessels

Community

Vessel Comments