VIVA

Compare

IMO: 9156539
MMSI: 572839220
Call Sign: T2GS6

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage

11,270GT

Deadweight

16,116DWT

Length Overall

135.98m

Beam

23m

Draught

7.6m

Year Built

1999

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value

$7.4Mrange $6.4M – $9.3M

$461/dwt · 16,116 dwt · built 1999

high confidence · 16 comps

Comparable sales

M/T RUBIKON 78 2005 · $7MBOW OCEANIC 1997 · $6MKIISLA 2004 · $6MSUULA 2005 · $6MADELINE 1999 · $5.5MCUMBRIAN FISHER 2004 · $7.2M

Second opinion±24% typical error

$4.9Mrange $4.8M – $9.2M

Value drivers & depreciation

Tanker value vs. age (typical size & today's market).

Typical tanker peer$30M

Age vs peer

−$17M

Size vs peer

−$17M

Model fit R² 0.40Typical error ±24%tested on 1,326 recent sales

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Open the full multi-model valuation

Risk scoreMedium

64/ 100

Safety48

Compliance93

Environment48

Carbon intensity · 2025E

835t CO₂

AER (CO₂/capacity·nm): 18.9
Fuel burned: 266 t
Technical: EEXI (8.72 gCO₂/t·nm)

Verified reported figure. Band is peer-relative, not official IMO CII.

Compliance

Safety Record

Port-State-Control detentions2

Dunkerque (GPM)22 deficiencies
Mar 12, 2026Paris MoU (THETIS)8 grounds for detention
Tonnage certificate; Declaration of Maritime Labour Compliance (Part I and II); Sanitary Facilities; Radar; Sewage comminuting and disinfecting system; Shipboard working arrangements; Quality of fuel oil; Emergency source of power - Emergency generator
ZYYI27 deficiencies
Jul 8, 2025Paris MoU (THETIS)20 grounds for detention
Fuel change-over procedure; Records of seafarers' daily hours of work or rest; BNWAS; Voyage data recorder (VDR) / Simplified Voyage data recorder (S-VDR); Provisions quantity; Heating, air conditioning and ventilation; Cold room, cold room cleanliness, cold room temperature; Navigation bridge visibility; Emergency source of power - Emergency generator; Means of recovery of life saving appliances; Launching arrangements for rescue boats; Personal equipment for fire safety; Emergency, lighting,batteries and switches; Nautical publications; Cargo tank vent system; ISM; Cleanliness of engine room; Bilge pumping arrangements; Other (alarms); Inert gas system

Port-State-Control detentions.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

90/100

High risk60% component coverage

Strong, corroborated adverse evidence — a detention, sanctions exposure or an AIS-gap / behavioural signal.

PSC detentions88

Sanctions exposureno data

AIS-gap & behaviourno data

Hull age88

Flag register100

A coverage-weighted blend of the 3 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtHigh confidence

~16,116t at summer draught

Tanker · summer draught 7.6 m · 27 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught

5.32 m~9,961 t

5.7 m~10,987 t

6.08 m~12,013 t

6.46 m~13,039 t

6.84 m~14,064 t

7.22 m~15,090 t

7.6 m~16,116 t

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (hull geometry) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classification

Declared

Tanker

→

Inferred from size

Tanker

density DWT/GT=1.43 is consistent with declared tanker

DWT/GT 1.43Beam/LOA 0.169Declared type: Chemical Tanker

Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Full compliance dossier

Commercial