- IMO
- 9251016
- MMSI
- 441246000
- Call Sign
- D8RV
Technical Specifications
Key Figures
Live Tracking
Current Position
Where it waited most
Most time stopped at Port of Busan — 31 h across 12 stays.
- 1Port of Busan31 h · 12×
Derived from the AIS track — runs of near-zero speed (anchored, moored or drifting) snapped to the nearest port. Builds up as we observe the vessel.
Resolved from the live AIS destination. Distance is the real sea route (around land and through canals); the computed ETA is at the vessel’s passage speed. A destination is the crew’s stated intent, not a confirmed fixture.
Intelligence
Risk & Sustainability
This ship has no verified emissions report. We estimate a band E from its segment, size and age (97% confidence).
Estimate, not a reported figure. Within one band 95% of the time on reported peers.
Operational Status
Activity
Making way at sea speed on its latest broadcast.
Read from the single most-recent AIS broadcast we hold for this hull — we keep no position history, so this is a point-in-time posture, not a dwell inference. Derived in-house from our own AIS feed; weight it by the broadcast age above.
Composite Risk
Risk Score
Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.
A coverage-weighted blend of the 3 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.
Estimated
Capacity & Classification
Container · summer draught 6.9 m · 11.9 t per cm immersion
Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight regression) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.
density DWT/GT=0.29 is physically implausible for any cargo ship (declared container) — likely a tonnage data error
The declared type conflicts with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals — a possible mis-declaration. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.
Transparency
Risk signals
Behavioural flags raised against this vessel — each shown with the raw evidence behind it. Derived in-house from data we are entitled to publish; informational, not a determination of wrongdoing.
Declared type contradicts the size-implied class
- Audit Confidence
- 0.95
- Beam Loa Ratio
- 0.149
- Deadweight
- 4,000
- Declared Class
- CONTAINER
- Declared Type
- Ro-Ro or Container Carrier
- Dwt Gt Ratio
- 0.292
- Gross Tonnage
- 13,681
- Reason
- density DWT/GT=0.29 is physically implausible for any cargo ship (declared container) — likely a tonnage data error
- Size Implied Class
- CONTAINER
Method: declared type vs size-implied class (DWT/GT density + beam/LOA fullness). Source: vessel_type_audit (sibling P3#3 job; shared coarse_class classifier).
Signals are a current-state view: a flag clears once the vessel stops tripping its detector. These are screening indicators, not a substitute for your own due diligence.
Commercial
Voyage Estimate
Explore More
Similar Vessels
Community
Vessel Comments