OOCL MONTREAL

Built by Hanwha Ocean in 2003

Compare

IMO: 9253739
MMSI: 477321000
Call Sign: VRYO3

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage

55,994GT

Deadweight

47,840DWT

Length Overall

293.99m

Beam

32.32m

Draught

10.7m

Year Built

2003

Live Tracking

Current Position

Live AIS · 4 h ago

Track · last 13 d

Position

50.260°N · 11.968°W

Speed

9.6 kn

Course

97°

Status

Under way using engine

Destination CAMTR > GBSOUETA Oct 14, 04:30 AMLaden · 10.0 m

Where it waited most

Most time stopped at Port of Montreal: 6 d across 2 stays.

1
Port of Montreal6 d · 2×
2
Port of Hamburg28 h
3
Antwerp28 h
4
Dunkirk27 h · 2×
5
Port of Southampton23 h

Derived from the AIS track: runs of near-zero speed (anchored, moored or drifting) snapped to the nearest port. Builds up as we observe the vessel.

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Quick estimate · comparable sales

$28.3Mrange $24.5M to $35.3M

$591/dwt · 47,840 dwt · built 2003

high confidence · 9 comps

Comparable sales

A-Rex Dexterity 2008 · $35.5MC/V SUNNY PHOENIX 2002 · $54MC/V FELIXSTOWE 2002 · $54MSEASPAN JAKARTA 2006 · $17MBALTIC WEST 2009 · $36MBF TIGER 2006 · $20M

Second opinion · model estimate±59% typical error

$15Mrange $5.2M to $21M

Value drivers & depreciation

How a hull like this loses value with age (today's market). The dot marks this ship at 23 yrs.

Typical container peer$19M

Age vs peer

−$7M

Size vs peer

+$7.6M

Model fit R² 0.47Typical error ±59%tested on 147 recent sales

A quick estimate: the median $/dwt of 9 similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months, not re-timed to today's market. The full valuation blends several models over recent sales adjusted for size, age and market moves, so its consensus value can differ from this figure. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

See the full valuation consensus

Risk scoreMedium

71/ 100

Safety58

Compliance95

Environment58

Carbon intensity · 2025C

24,789t CO₂

AER (CO₂/capacity·nm): 9.8
Fuel burned: 7,835 t
Technical: EEXI (13.97 gCO₂/t·nm)

Verified reported figure. Band is peer-relative, not official IMO CII.

Recent port calls

Montréal-Est
Sep 30, 2026
2.5 d
Altenwerder
Sep 15, 2026
1.2 d
Zandvliet
Sep 13, 2026
1.2 d
Eling
Sep 9, 2026
1.0 d
Montréal-Est
Aug 26, 2026
3.5 d

AIS-derived from our live feed.

Compliance

Safety Record

Marine casualties3

Damage/UnseaworthySerious
Sep 29, 2023Cape Pine, NEWFOUNDLAND AND LABRADOR (NL)
On 29 September 2023, the container ship "OOCL MONTREAL" reported a crack in its No. 5 double bottom water ballast tank at The Grand Banks of Newfoundland, NL. The crew conducted temporary repairs and the vessel proceeded to Montréal, QC.
Machinery FailureMinor
Oct 20, 2013GULF OF ST. LAWRENCE, QC, QUEBEC (QC)
On 20 October 2013, the container vessel "OOCL MONTREAL" reported a steering gear pump failure while transiting on the Gulf of St. Lawrence, QC. No pollution or injuries, damage limited to steering gear pump.
Near-MissMinor
Jun 20, 2005CAP-DE-LA-MADELEINE, FLEUVE SAINT-LAURENT, QUEBEC (QC)
The upbound container vessel "OOCL MONTREAL" reported a close quarters situation with a sail boat.

Recorded marine occurrences naming this vessel.

Build Series

Sister Vessels

2 sisters

Hanwha Ocean · CONTAINER · 2003 · 3-hull series

TORONTO EXPRESS

Built 200347,840 DWTIMO 9253727

MONTREAL EXPRESS

Built 200347,754 DWTIMO 9253741

Sister hulls share a yard, segment, build year (±1) and deadweight (±3%): the cleanest comparables for valuation. Derived in-house from our fleet register; coverage is limited to hulls carrying a recorded builder, so a series may be incomplete.

Operational Status

Activity

Under wayFix within the last day

Making way at sea speed on its latest broadcast.

Speed

9.6 kn

Nav status

Under way using engine

Last broadcast

within the last day

Hull age

23 yr

Read from the single most-recent AIS broadcast we hold for this hull. We keep no position history, so this is a point-in-time posture, not a dwell inference. Derived in-house from our own AIS feed; weight it by the broadcast age above.

Port calls

11 recent · AIS-detected

Arrivals, time in port and the load/discharge inferred from the draught change, detected from AIS track history. An open call means the vessel is still in port (no departure observed yet).

Montréal-Est
no cargo change
→ · 2.5 days in port· draught 10.5→10.0 m
Altenwerder
Loaded
→ · 29 h in port· draught 9.8→10.5 m
Zandvliet
no cargo change
→ · 29 h in port· draught 9.7→9.8 m
Eling
no cargo change
→ · 25 h in port· draught 9.6→9.6 m
Montréal-Est
Discharged
→ · 3.5 days in port· draught 10.4→9.8 m
Eling
no cargo change
→ · 3 h in port· draught 10.3→10.3 m
Altenwerder
Loaded
→ · 34 h in port· draught 9.5→10.6 m
Eling
no cargo change
→ · 13 h in port· draught 9.7→10.0 m
Zandvliet
Loaded
→ · 20 h in port· draught 8.3→10.2 m
Port of Zeebrugge
no cargo change
→ · 14 h in port· draught 8.3→8.3 m
Port of Zeebrugge
no cargo change
→ · 18 h in port· draught 8.3→8.3 m

Method: each call is a run of fixes inside a port’s geofence confirmed by a stop (or an AIS gap); load/discharge is the sign of the draught delta over the call. Indicative: arrivals before our AIS history began read from the first observation.

Where it waits

5 ports · 13.7 days total

Time-in-port summed by port from the AIS-detected port-call history: the ports this vessel has spent the most time at, longest first.

Montréal-Est· Canada
6.1 days
2 calls · 3.0 days avg 1 discharge
Altenwerder· Germany
2.6 days
2 calls · 32 h avg 2 loads
Zandvliet· Belgium
2.0 days
2 calls · 24 h avg 1 load
Eling· United Kingdom
41 h
3 calls · 14 h avg
Port of Zeebrugge· Belgium
32 h
2 calls · 16 h avg

Based on 11 completed calls observed since . Open calls (no departure yet) are excluded. The distribution sharpens as AIS history accrues.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

73/100

Elevated riskLow confidence40% component coverage

Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.

PSC detentionsno data

Sanctions exposureno data

AIS-gap & behaviourno data

Hull age72

Flag register75

A coverage-weighted blend of the 2 components we could read for this hull; the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. This headline is flagged low-confidence (a thin or structural-only read) and should not be treated as a verdict. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtHigh confidence

~47,840t at summer draught

Container · summer draught 10.7 m · 71.8 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught

7.49 m~24,805 t

8.02 m~28,644 t

8.56 m~32,484 t

9.09 m~36,323 t

9.63 m~40,162 t

10.17 m~44,001 t

10.7 m~47,840 t

Estimate only: modelled from deadweight (hull geometry) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classification

Declared

Container

→

Inferred from size

Container

density DWT/GT=0.85 is consistent with declared container

DWT/GT 0.85Beam/LOA 0.11Declared type: Container Ship

Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Full compliance dossier

Commercial

Voyage Planning

Plan a voyage for this ship

Price it in the Route Planner between any two commercial ports: ballast and laden legs, two fuels at live bunker prices, port and canal costs, the weather on the way, and the TCE set against the market.

Segment: Containership
Deadweight: 47,840 DWT
Speed: 16 kn
Fuel 1 at sea: 45 t/day

Typical Sub-Panamax speed and burn. Replace them with the ship's own figures in the planner.

Open in the Route Planner