
Technical Specifications
Intelligence
Container value vs. age (typical size & today's market).
A quick estimate: the median $/dwt of 3 similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months, not re-timed to today's market. The full valuation blends several models over recent sales adjusted for size, age and market moves, so its consensus value can differ from this figure. Indicative, not a certified valuation.
See the full valuation consensusThis ship has no verified emissions report. We estimate a band C from its segment, size and age (80% confidence).
Estimate, not a reported figure. Within one band 94% of the time on reported peers.
Compliance
On 24 August 2022, the container vessel "MISSISSAUGA EXPRESS" reported sustaining the failure of its main engine whilst departing from Dock No. 77 in the Port of Montreal in Montréal, QC. The vessel was escorted to Dock No. 58 for a technical investigation.
On 17 November 2021, the container vessel "MISSISSAUGA EXPRESS" reported sustaining a main engine malfunction on the St. Lawrence River off Les Escoumins, QC. The vessel proceeded to the Île-aux-Basques-et-des-Razades anchorage off Trois-Pistoles, QC for repairs.
On 07 March 2019, the container vessel "MISSISSAUGA EXPRESS" reported a machinery failure that caused the partial loss of main engine power while the vessel was in the St. Lawrence River off Les Escoumins pilot station, QC. The vessel proceeded to Les Razades anchorage off Trois-Pistoles, QC, where the crew carried out repairs and the vessel resumed its voyage.
On 01 September 2015, the container vessel "MISSISSAUGA EXPRESS" reported a risk of collision, requiring evasive action, with a pleasure craft on the St. Lawrence River off Saint- Antoine-de-Tilly, QC.
While proceeding upbound the M/V "CANMAR PRIDE" experienced momentary steering gear failure.
Recorded marine occurrences naming this vessel.
Build Series
Sister hulls share a yard, segment, build year (±1) and deadweight (±3%): the cleanest comparables for valuation. Derived in-house from our fleet register; coverage is limited to hulls carrying a recorded builder, so a series may be incomplete.
Composite Risk
Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.
A coverage-weighted blend of the 2 components we could read for this hull; the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. This headline is flagged low-confidence (a thin or structural-only read) and should not be treated as a verdict. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.
Estimated
Container · summer draught 9 m · 69.8 t per cm immersion
Estimate only: modelled from deadweight (hull geometry) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.
density DWT/GT=1.04 is consistent with declared container
Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.
Commercial
Price it in the Route Planner between any two commercial ports: ballast and laden legs, two fuels at live bunker prices, port and canal costs, the weather on the way, and the TCE set against the market.
Typical Sub-Panamax speed and burn. Replace them with the ship's own figures in the planner.

Visual Archive
Explore More