
Technical Specifications
Intelligence
Container value vs. age (typical size & today's market).
Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.
Open the full multi-model valuationThis ship has no verified emissions report. We estimate a band C from its segment, size and age (80% confidence).
Estimate, not a reported figure. Within one band 95% of the time on reported peers.
Compliance
On 30 March 2021, the container ship "OTTAWA EXPRESS", while under the conduct of a pilot, reported high exhaust temperatures on the main engine's unit no. 5 while transiting on the St. Lawrence River. The vessel continued its voyage at a reduced speed and berthed in Montreal, QC where the crew carried out repairs. On 03 April 2021, the vessel reported an oil leak on its unit no. 2 exhaust valve and a leakage on one of the mud hole covers of its composite boiler. The crew carried out repairs on the exhaust valve and the vessel was allowed to proceed to the anchorage in Trois-Rivieres, QC to carry out repairs on the composite boiler.
On 04 July 2020, the container vessel "OTTAWA EXPRESS" sustained a power failure near the Port of Montreal, QC. The vessel dropped anchor and required the assistance of tugs.
On 31 December 2017, the container vessel "OTTAWA EXPRESS" reported being disabled due to a main engine shut down by the overload safety, on the St. Lawrence River near the Quebec bridge, QC. The vessel drifted backward under the bridges and restarted its engine approximatively 40 minutes later. The vessel resumed its voyage under engine manual controls.
On 21 June 05, in St Antoine Traverse on the St.Lawrence, a close quarters situation developed between the container ship CANMAR HONOUR and the sail boat BAGATELLE. The container ship had to carry out an evasive manoeuvre to avoid a collision.
Recorded marine occurrences naming this vessel.
Build Series
Sister hulls share a yard, segment, build year (±1) and deadweight (±3%) — the cleanest comparables for valuation. Derived in-house from our fleet register; coverage is limited to hulls carrying a recorded builder, so a series may be incomplete.
Composite Risk
Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.
A coverage-weighted blend of the 2 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. This headline is flagged low-confidence (a thin or structural-only read) and should not be treated as a verdict. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.
Estimated
Container · summer draught 9.8 m · 65.3 t per cm immersion
Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (hull geometry) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.
density DWT/GT=1.04 is consistent with declared container
Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.
Commercial

Visual Archive
Explore More