Oil or Chemical Tanker🇩🇰 DenmarkActive

MAERSK TEESPORT

Built by Sungdong Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering in 2016

Compare

IMO: 9726463
MMSI: 219190000
Call Sign: OYGU2

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage

29,445GT

Deadweight

49,990DWT

Length Overall

183m

Beam

32m

Draught

11.8m

Year Built

2016

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value

$35Mrange $30.1M – $42.5M

$700/dwt · 49,990 dwt · built 2016

high confidence · 59 comps

Comparable sales

STI OSCEOLA 2015 · $35MSTI SENECA 2015 · $35MSTI BATTERY 2014 · $32MSTI TEXAS CITY 2014 · $42.5MSTI OPERA 2014 · $41MSTI SAN ANTONIO 2014 · $42.5M

Second opinion±27% typical error

$42.4Mrange $33.2M – $45.4M

An independent cross-check of the estimate above for Tanker (segment · size · age · market).

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Risk scoreLow

90/ 100

Safety88

Compliance95

Environment88

Carbon intensity · 2024C

4,636t CO₂

AER (CO₂/capacity·nm): 5.2
Fuel burned: 1,477 t
Technical: EEDI (4.08 gCO₂/t·nm)

Verified reported figure. Band is peer-relative, not official IMO CII.

Build Series

Sister Vessels

1 sister

Sungdong Shipbuilding & Marine Engineering · TANKER · 2015–2016 · 2-hull series

MAERSK TRIESTE

Built 201549,828 DWTIMO 9708617

Sister hulls share a yard, segment, build year (±1) and deadweight (±3%) — the cleanest comparables for valuation. Derived in-house from our fleet register; coverage is limited to hulls carrying a recorded builder, so a series may be incomplete.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

22/100

Low riskLow confidence40% component coverage

No strong adverse signal on the components we could read for this hull.

PSC detentionsno data

Sanctions exposureno data

Dark-fleet signalno data

Hull age20

Flag register25

A coverage-weighted blend of the 2 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. This headline is flagged low-confidence (a thin or structural-only read) and should not be treated as a verdict. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtHigh confidence

~49,990t at summer draught

Tanker · summer draught 11.8 m · 53.2 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught

8.26 m~31,145 t

8.85 m~34,286 t

9.44 m~37,427 t

10.03 m~40,567 t

10.62 m~43,708 t

11.21 m~46,849 t

11.8 m~49,990 t

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (hull geometry) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classification

Declared

Tanker

→

Inferred from size

Tanker

density DWT/GT=1.70 is consistent with declared tanker

DWT/GT 1.7Beam/LOA 0.175Declared type: Oil or Chemical Tanker

Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Commercial