
Technical Specifications
Intelligence
Compliance
On 26 October 2022, the cargo vessel "JEAN-JOSEPH" reported experiencing issues with its main engine's turbo in the St. Lawrence River off Tadoussac, QC. Under reduced power, the vessel proceeded to Le Gros Cacouna, QC to assess the issue.
On 26 October 2022, the general cargo vessel "JEAN-JOSEPH" reported experiencing main engine issues while in the port of Gros Cacouna, QC. A technician on board the vessel conducted repairs.
On 28 September 2022, the cargo vessel "JEAN-JOSEPH" reported an oil leak from its sterntube in Port-Cartier, QC. The crew cleaned up the spill.
On 27 April 2022, the general cargo vessel "JEAN-JOSEPH", while under the conduct of a pilot, reported experiencing engine issues in the St. Lawrence River off Bécancour, QC. The crew proceeded to Bécancour, QC to assess the problem and carry out repairs.
On 12 November 2021, the general cargo vessel "JEAN-JOSEPH" reported being disabled with engine issues, 4.5 nautical miles SW of Verchères, QC. The crew restarted the engines and proceeded to Montréal, QC to assess the problem and carry out repairs
On 01 September 2021, the general cargo vessel "JEAN-JOSEPH", reported being disabled with engine issues, 5 nautical miles NE of Cloridorme, QC. The crew restarted the engines and sailed to a nearby anchorage to assess the problem and carry out repairs
On 19 June 2021, the cargo vessel "JEAN-JOSEPH" reported one of its crew members as having sustained serious injuries during cargo operations in Matane, QC. The crew member was transported to the hospital for treatment.
On 16 May 2019, the general cargo vessel "JEAN-JOSEPH" reported a crew member sustained injuries 10 nautical miles S of Forestville, QC. The crew member received medical attention on arrival at Cacouna, QC.
Recorded marine occurrences naming this vessel.
Build Series
Sister hulls share a yard, segment, build year (±1) and deadweight (±3%) — the cleanest comparables for valuation. Derived in-house from our fleet register; coverage is limited to hulls carrying a recorded builder, so a series may be incomplete.
Composite Risk
Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.
A coverage-weighted blend of the 2 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. This headline is flagged low-confidence (a thin or structural-only read) and should not be treated as a verdict. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.
Estimated
Other · summer draught 3.1 m · 9.7 t per cm immersion
Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight regression) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.
Commercial
Explore More