GUDENA

Compare

IMO: 9280196
MMSI: 271051502
Call Sign: TCA7571

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage

2,798GT

Deadweight

4,274DWT

Length Overall

96.3m

Beam

14.2m

Draught

Year Built

2004

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value

$4.2Mrange $4.1M – $4.2M

$976/dwt · 4,274 dwt · built 2004

low confidence · 2 comps

Comparable sales

DING HENG 2 2007 · $4MKIMOLOS — · $4.6M

Second opinion±24% typical error

$4.7Mrange $4.7M – $10.5M

Value drivers & depreciation

How a hull like this loses value with age (today's market). The dot marks this ship at 22 yrs.

Typical tanker peer$30M

Age vs peer

−$14M

Size vs peer

−$20M

Model fit R² 0.40Typical error ±24%tested on 1,326 recent sales

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Open the full multi-model valuation

Risk scoreMedium

71/ 100

Safety58

Compliance95

Environment58

Carbon intensity · estimatedE

This ship has no verified emissions report. We estimate a band E from its segment, size and age (71% confidence).

Estimate, not a reported figure. Within one band 95% of the time on reported peers.

Compliance

Safety Record

Port-State-Control detentions2

Constanta18 deficiencies
Jun 20, 2023Paris MoU (THETIS)9 grounds for detention
Voyage or passage plan; Fire drills; Nautical publications; Provisions quantity; Heating, air conditioning and ventilation; Efficient stripping; Atmosphere testing instrument; Emergency, lighting,batteries and switches; ISM
Ravenna26 deficiencies
Feb 5, 2022Paris MoU (THETIS)13 grounds for detention
Cleanliness of engine room; Emergency fire pump and its pipes; Fire doors/openings in fire-resisting divisions; Emergency steering position com./ compass reading; Emergency source of power - Emergency generator; Facilities for reception of marine safety inform.; Fixed fire extinguishing installation; Provisions quantity; Sanitary Facilities; Certificate for rating for watchkeeping; Certificate for rating for watchkeeping; Seafarers' employment agreement (SEA); On board training and instructions

Port-State-Control detentions.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

67/100

Elevated risk60% component coverage

Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.

PSC detentions88

Sanctions exposureno data

AIS-gap & behaviourno data

Hull age68

Flag register0

A coverage-weighted blend of the 3 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtHigh confidence

~4,274t at summer draught

Tanker · summer draught 5 m · 11.1 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught

3.5 m~2,613 t

3.75 m~2,890 t

4 m~3,167 t

4.25 m~3,444 t

4.5 m~3,720 t

4.75 m~3,997 t

5 m~4,274 t

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (hull geometry) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classification

Declared

Tanker

→

Inferred from size

Tanker

density DWT/GT=1.53 is consistent with declared tanker

DWT/GT 1.53Beam/LOA 0.147Declared type: Oil or Chemical Tanker

Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Full compliance dossier

Commercial