VIOLET 3

Compare

IMO: 9108104
MMSI: 511101674
Call Sign: T8A5142

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage

12,394GT

Deadweight

19,999DWT

Length Overall

152.53m

Beam

24.2m

Draught

Year Built

1995

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value

$6.9Mrange $6.4M – $6.9M

$344/dwt · 19,999 dwt · built 1995

low confidence · 3 comps

Comparable sales

GINGA HAWK 2000 · $6.9MGINGA KITE 2001 · $6MBOW OCEANIC 1997 · $6M

Second opinion±24% typical error

$7.9Mrange $6.2M – $13.9M

Value drivers & depreciation

Tanker value vs. age (typical size & today's market).

Typical tanker peer$30M

Age vs peer

−$17M

Size vs peer

−$8.3M

Model fit R² 0.40Typical error ±24%tested on 1,326 recent sales

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Open the full multi-model valuation

Risk scoreHigh

52/ 100

Safety38

Compliance77

Environment38

Carbon intensity · estimatedD

This ship has no verified emissions report. We estimate a band D from its segment, size and age (51% confidence).

Estimate, not a reported figure. Within one band 95% of the time on reported peers.

Compliance

Safety Record

Port-State-Control detentions1

Andere55 deficiencies
Nov 24, 2022Paris MoU (THETIS)22 grounds for detention
Heating, air conditioning and ventilation; ISM; Emergency fire pump and its pipes; Lights, shapes, sound-signals; Winches & capstans; Winches & capstans; Lifeboats; Lifeboat inventory; Galley, handlingroom (maintenance); Steam pipes, pressure pipes, wires (insulation); Jacketed high pressure lines and oil leakage alarm; Seafarers' employment agreement (SEA); Ballast Water Management Certificate; Ballast, fuel and other tanks; Decks - corrosion; Ballast, fuel and other tanks; Ventilation; Closing devices/watertight doors; Personal equipment for fire safety; Hospital accomodation (Sickbay); Document of Compliance (DoC/ ISM); Fire drills

Port-State-Control detentions.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

84/100

High risk60% component coverage

Strong, corroborated adverse evidence — a detention, sanctions exposure or an AIS-gap / behavioural signal.

PSC detentions70

Sanctions exposureno data

AIS-gap & behaviourno data

Hull age100

Flag register100

A coverage-weighted blend of the 3 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtMedium confidence

~19,999t at summer draught

Tanker · summer draught 7 m · 30 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught

4.9 m~13,708 t

5.25 m~14,756 t

5.6 m~15,805 t

5.95 m~16,853 t

6.3 m~17,902 t

6.65 m~18,950 t

7 m~19,999 t

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight regression) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classification

Declared

Tanker

→

Inferred from size

Tanker

density DWT/GT=1.61 is consistent with declared tanker

DWT/GT 1.61Beam/LOA 0.159Declared type: Oil or Chemical Tanker

Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Full compliance dossier

Commercial