
One vessel, every compliance signal in one place: sanctions exposure path, composite risk, dark-fleet behaviour, flag history and safety record.
No sanctions exposure was found, but the composite risk read is elevated. See the breakdown below.
Sanctions exposure screens the hull and its ownership chain against official OFAC, EU, UN and UK designations, then propagates a sanctioned owner or parent down to the vessels it controls. The composite risk read blends age, flag register, port-state detentions, dark-fleet behaviour and sanctions exposure, weighted by how much evidence is present. Every signal shows its own evidence. This is decision support for a compliance review, not a legal determination.
Composite Risk
Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.
A coverage-weighted blend of the single component we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. This headline is flagged low-confidence (a thin or structural-only read) and should not be treated as a verdict. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.
Compliance
On 08 July 2014, a passenger on board the PV "MAASDAM" fell and broke a leg.
On 08 September 2012, the "MAASDAM" struck the dock while berthing at section 17 of the Port of Montreal, Quebec. No injuries or pollution reported; minor damage reported to the vessel.
On 14 October 2011, the "MAASDAM'' struck the wharf while undocking in the port of Quebec, section 93. Damage was reported to the vessel and the dock. Neither injuries nor pollution was reported.
On 03 June 2005, a close quarters situation developed between the the upbound vessel MAASDAM and the sailboat UNK/INC KC8450 near Anse aux Foulon in the port of Québec.
Recorded marine occurrences naming this vessel.