Oil or Chemical Tanker🇮🇹 ItalyActive

PEONIA

Compare

IMO: 9313436
MMSI: 247450100
Call Sign: IBDB

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage

19,549GT

Deadweight

28,987DWT

Length Overall

164.5m

Beam

27.6m

Draught

9.5m

Year Built

2005

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value

$15.3Mrange $10.5M – $20.5M

$527/dwt · 28,987 dwt · built 2005

high confidence · 18 comps

Comparable sales

OM SINGAPORE 2007 · $13.8MMAERSK BERING 2005 · $15.8MLYDERHORN 2006 · $26.6MANGELINA AMORETTI 2004 · $6MEASTERLY JUPITER 2009 · $20MEASTERLY CANYON 2009 · $19M

Second opinion±27% typical error

$13.4Mrange $8.4M – $16M

An independent cross-check of the estimate above for Tanker (segment · size · age · market).

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Risk scoreMedium

71/ 100

Safety58

Compliance95

Environment58

Carbon intensity · 2024C

9,585t CO₂

AER (CO₂/capacity·nm): 8.8
Fuel burned: 3,048 t
Technical: EEXI (6.48 gCO₂/t·nm)

Verified reported figure. Band is peer-relative, not official IMO CII.

Compliance

Safety Record

Marine casualties1

PERSON SERIOUSLY INJURED OR KILLED - Boarding, being on board, falling overboard from the shipSerious
Nov 4, 2023La Razade d'en Bas, QUEBEC (QC)
On 04 November 2023, the tanker "PEONIA", while anchored off Les Razades, QC, reported that one of its crew members was incapacitated and needed medical attention. The crew member was disembarked and a substitute crew member was called for boarding.

Recorded marine occurrences naming this vessel.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

38/100

Moderate riskLow confidence40% component coverage

Some elevated factors — typically age or a lower-graded flag — but no acute ship-specific flag.

PSC detentionsno data

Sanctions exposureno data

Dark-fleet signalno data

Hull age64

Flag register0

A coverage-weighted blend of the 2 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. This headline is flagged low-confidence (a thin or structural-only read) and should not be treated as a verdict. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtHigh confidence

~28,987t at summer draught

Tanker · summer draught 9.5 m · 38.9 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught

6.65 m~17,897 t

7.13 m~19,745 t

7.6 m~21,593 t

8.08 m~23,442 t

8.55 m~25,290 t

9.03 m~27,139 t

9.5 m~28,987 t

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (hull geometry) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classification

Declared

Tanker

→

Inferred from size

Tanker

density DWT/GT=1.48 is consistent with declared tanker

DWT/GT 1.48Beam/LOA 0.168Declared type: Oil or Chemical Tanker

Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Commercial