TheMaritime.net
Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%
Bunkering Tanker🇱🇻 LatviaActive

OPTIMUS

IMO
9870472
MMSI
275525000
Call Sign
YLRT

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage
6,357GT
Deadweight
3,630DWT
Length Overall
99.8m
Beam
18.6m
Draught
4.6m
Year Built
2021

Live Tracking

Current Position

Live AIS · 2 h ago
Track · last 13 d
Position
51.735°N · 2.692°E
Speed
8.8 kn
Course
19°
Status
Under way using engine
Destination DECUXETA Jul 3, 05:30 AMLaden · 4.9 m

Where it waited most

Most time stopped at Rotterdam Europoort 2 d across 2 stays.

  1. 1
  2. 2
    Ellerbek16 h · 4×
  3. 3
  4. 4
    Kiel8 h
  5. 5
    Thorntonbank5 h · 5×

Derived from the AIS track — runs of near-zero speed (anchored, moored or drifting) snapped to the nearest port. Builds up as we observe the vessel.

Underway to

Port of Zeebrugge

BelgiumAIS: BEZEE
Distance
0 nm
sea route
ETA (computed)
at 11 kn
Speed now
10.7 kn
Under way using engine
Crew ETA
not reported

Resolved from the live AIS destination. Distance is the real sea route (around land and through canals); the computed ETA is at the vessel’s passage speed. A destination is the crew’s stated intent, not a confirmed fixture.

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Risk scoreLow
95/ 100
Safety95
Compliance95
Environment95
Carbon intensity · 2024E
4,301t CO₂
AER (CO₂/capacity·nm)
37.8
Fuel burned
1,554 t
Technical
EEXI (24.36 gCO₂/t·nm)

Verified reported figure. Band is peer-relative, not official IMO CII.

Recent port calls

AIS-derived from our live feed.

Operational Status

Activity

Under wayFix within the last day

Making way at sea speed on its latest broadcast.

Speed
10.8 kn
Nav status
Under way using engine
Last broadcast
within the last day
Hull age
5 yr

Read from the single most-recent AIS broadcast we hold for this hull — we keep no position history, so this is a point-in-time posture, not a dwell inference. Derived in-house from our own AIS feed; weight it by the broadcast age above.

Port calls

4 recent · AIS-detected

Arrivals, time in port and the load/discharge inferred from the draught change — detected from AIS track history. An open call means the vessel is still in port (no departure observed yet).

  1. no cargo change
    · 14 h in port· draught 4.74.6 m
  2. no cargo change
    · 9 h in port· draught 4.84.8 m
  3. no cargo change
    · 8 h in port· draught 4.84.8 m
  4. no cargo change
    · 9 h in port· draught 4.84.8 m

Method: each call is a run of fixes inside a port’s geofence confirmed by a stop (or an AIS gap); load/discharge is the sign of the draught delta over the call. Indicative — arrivals before our AIS history began read from the first observation.

Where it waits

3 ports · 40 h total

Time-in-port summed by port from the AIS-detected port-call history — the ports this vessel has spent the most time at, longest first.

  1. Ellerbek· Germany
    18 h
    2 calls · 9 h avg
  2. Portsmouth Harbour· United Kingdom
    14 h
    1 call · 14 h avg
  3. Kiel· Germany
    8 h
    1 call · 8 h avg

Based on 4 completed calls observed since — open calls (no departure yet) are excluded. The distribution sharpens as AIS history accrues.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

58/100
Elevated risk60% component coverage

Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.

PSC detentionsno data
Sanctions exposureno data
Dark-fleet signal80
Hull age0
Flag register100

A coverage-weighted blend of the 3 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtHigh confidence
~3,630t at summer draught

Tanker · summer draught 4.6 m · 11.3 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught
3.22 m~2,074 t
3.45 m~2,334 t
3.68 m~2,593 t
3.91 m~2,852 t
4.14 m~3,111 t
4.37 m~3,371 t
4.6 m~3,630 t

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (hull geometry) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classificationConflict
Declared
Tanker
Inferred from size
Gas

declared tanker but density DWT/GT=0.57 is below the light-cargo cut 1.05 — under even a small bulker/tanker (typical >= 1.2); reads like a gas carrier or storage/FSO unit

DWT/GT 0.57Beam/LOA 0.186Declared type: Bunkering Tanker

The declared type conflicts with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals — a possible mis-declaration. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Transparency

Risk signals

Behavioural flags raised against this vessel — each shown with the raw evidence behind it. Derived in-house from data we are entitled to publish; informational, not a determination of wrongdoing.

Type vs. size mismatchhighstrength 1.00

Declared type contradicts the size-implied class

Audit Confidence
1
Beam Loa Ratio
0.186
Deadweight
3,630
Declared Class
TANKER
Declared Type
Bunkering Tanker
Dwt Gt Ratio
0.571
Gross Tonnage
6,357
Reason
declared tanker but density DWT/GT=0.57 is below the light-cargo cut 1.05 — under even a small bulker/tanker (typical >= 1.2); reads like a gas carrier or storage/FSO unit
Size Implied Class
GAS

Method: declared type vs size-implied class (DWT/GT density + beam/LOA fullness). Source: vessel_type_audit (sibling P3#3 job; shared coarse_class classifier).

Signals are a current-state view: a flag clears once the vessel stops tripping its detector. These are screening indicators, not a substitute for your own due diligence.

Commercial

Voyage Estimate

From 3,630 DWT · ~9 t/day · bunker @ live VLSFO.
OPTIMUS

Visual Archive

Gallery

Explore More

Similar Vessels

Community

Vessel Comments