MSC ANS

Compare

IMO: 9282261
MMSI: 353873000
Call Sign: H3MH

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage

54,304GT

Deadweight

68,599DWT

Length Overall

294.1m

Beam

32.31m

Draught

9.2m

Year Built

2004

Live Tracking

Current Position

Live AIS · 13 d ago

Track · last 17 h

Position

33.752°N · 118.242°W

Speed

0.0 kn

Course

144°

Status

Moored

Destination USLGBETA Aug 17, 09:00 PMLaden · 11.5 m

Where it waited most

Most time stopped at Port of Los Angeles — 32 h across 1 stay.

1
Port of Los Angeles32 h

Derived from the AIS track — runs of near-zero speed (anchored, moored or drifting) snapped to the nearest port. Builds up as we observe the vessel.

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value

$44Mrange $34.5M – $56.2M

$642/dwt · 68,599 dwt · built 2004

high confidence · 8 comps

Comparable sales

BRUSSELS 2000 · $26MCELSIUS NAPLES 2009 · $34.5MSPIRIT OF HONG KONG 2010 · $30.1MBALTIC WEST 2009 · $36MSEASPAN JAKARTA 2006 · $17MC/V FELIXSTOWE 2002 · $54M

Second opinion±59% typical error

$23.1Mrange $5.5M – $40.7M

Value drivers & depreciation

How a hull like this loses value with age (today's market). The dot marks this ship at 22 yrs.

Typical container peer$20M

Age vs peer

−$8.1M

Size vs peer

+$19M

Model fit R² 0.47Typical error ±59%tested on 147 recent sales

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Open the full multi-model valuation

Risk scoreMedium

71/ 100

Safety58

Compliance95

Environment58

Carbon intensity · 2025B

7,758t CO₂

AER (CO₂/capacity·nm): 7.9
Fuel burned: 2,484 t
Technical: EEXI (11.22 gCO₂/t·nm)

Verified reported figure. Band is peer-relative, not official IMO CII.

Recent port calls

Port of Los Angeles
Aug 17, 2026
1.6 d

AIS-derived from our live feed.

Compliance

Safety Record

Marine casualties2

Machinery FailureMinor
Jul 23, 2023Deltaport, BRITISH COLUMBIA (BC)
On 23 July 2023, the container ship "MSC ANS", while under the conduct of a pilot and assisted by tugs, reported having sustained the complete failure of its bowthruster, and the breakage of a fairlead while berthing at the Deltaport Container Terminal, BC. The broken part felt on the deck of the tug "OCEAN KITSILANO".
Machinery FailureMinor
Apr 30, 2018Saint-Nicholas, QC, QUEBEC (QC)
On 30 April 2018, the container vessel "MSC ANS" reported a main engine cooling system failure, off Saint-Nicholas, QC. The vessel continued its transit to Montreal, QC at reduced speed where repairs will be carrier out.

Recorded marine occurrences naming this vessel.

Operational Status

Activity

Likely laid upLow confidenceFix 8 days ago

An older hull, stopped, whose last broadcast is itself no longer fresh — a cautious lay-up proxy.

Speed

0.0 kn

Nav status

Moored

Last broadcast

8 days ago

Hull age

22 yr

Read from the single most-recent AIS broadcast we hold for this hull — we keep no position history, so this is a point-in-time posture, not a dwell inference. “Likely laid up” is a cautious proxy (an old hull, stopped, with a non-fresh fix), not a confirmed lay-up. Derived in-house from our own AIS feed; weight it by the broadcast age above.

Port calls

1 recent · AIS-detected

Arrivals, time in port and the load/discharge inferred from the draught change — detected from AIS track history. An open call means the vessel is still in port (no departure observed yet).

Port of Los Angeles
op. unknown
In port since

Method: each call is a run of fixes inside a port’s geofence confirmed by a stop (or an AIS gap); load/discharge is the sign of the draught delta over the call. Indicative — arrivals before our AIS history began read from the first observation.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

67/100

Elevated risk60% component coverage

Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.

PSC detentionsno data

Sanctions exposureno data

AIS-gap & behaviour50

Hull age68

Flag register100

A coverage-weighted blend of the 3 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtMedium confidence

~68,599t at summer draught

Container · summer draught 9.2 m · 87.1 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught

6.44 m~44,568 t

6.9 m~48,573 t

7.36 m~52,578 t

7.82 m~56,584 t

8.28 m~60,589 t

8.74 m~64,594 t

9.2 m~68,599 t

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight regression) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classification

Declared

Container

→

Inferred from size

Container

density DWT/GT=1.26 is consistent with declared container

DWT/GT 1.26Beam/LOA 0.11Declared type: Container Ship

Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Transparency

Risk signals

Behavioural flags raised against this vessel — each shown with the raw evidence behind it. Derived in-house from data we are entitled to publish; informational, not a determination of wrongdoing.

AIS gapmediumstrength 0.61

Stopped transmitting relative to the live feed front

Jul 5, 2026

Feed Front: Aug 27, 2026
Gap Days: 8.54
Last Fix: Aug 19, 2026
On Sanctions List: no
Threshold Days: 3

Method: gap measured vs the live feed's own max timestamp, not wall-clock. Source: TheMaritime aisstream.io ingest (ais_positions).

Signals are a current-state view: a flag clears once the vessel stops tripping its detector. These are screening indicators, not a substitute for your own due diligence.

Full compliance dossier

Commercial