
Technical Specifications
Live Tracking
Intelligence
How a hull like this loses value with age (today's market). The dot marks this ship at 9 yrs.
Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.
Open the full multi-model valuationVerified reported figure. Band is peer-relative, not official IMO CII.
Compliance
On 28 April 2025, the chemical/products tanker "MIA DESGAGNES", while under the conduct of a pilot, reported having experienced a close quarters situation with a recreational craft in the St. Lawrence River off Cap Rouge, QC.
On 03 June 2023, the tanker "MIA DESGAGNES" reported having sustained a total loss of propulsion while proceeding downbound in the Laurentian Channel, QC. The crew restarted the engine and resumed their voyage to Halifax, NS.
On 23 July 2022, the chemical tanker "MIA DESGAGNES" reported having engine issues while transiting in Ungava Bay, QC. The vessel transited to a safe anchorage location nearby and the crew carried out repairs which allowed the vessel to resume its voyage.
On 14 February 2022, the tanker "MIA DESGAGNES" reported having lost its port anchor, 12 nautical miles ESE from Les Escoumins, QC at the Île-aux-Basques-et-des-Razades Anchorage. The vessel was able to proceed on its voyage with one anchor.
On 19 December 2020, the product/chemical tanker "MIA DESGAGNES" allided with a mooring dolphin while berthing at Saint-Romuald, QC (section No. 86).
On 14 November 2018, the product/chemical tanker "MIA DESGAGNES" experienced a blackout, caused by a malfunction of the shaft generator, on Lake Ontario, ON. The crew was able to effect repairs and continue the voyage.
On 02 November 2018, the tanker "MIA DESGAGNES" sustained a total failure of the main engine. The crew dropped anchor near the Port de Montréal, QC.
On 01 November 2018, the tanker "MIA DESGAGNES" reported smoke coming from the pump room while the vessel was at anchor at Pointe-aux-Trembles, Montreal, QC. The smoke was caused by a faulty electric motor.
Recorded marine occurrences naming this vessel.
Operational Status
The latest broadcast is too stale or lacks the speed / status to classify.
Read from the single most-recent AIS broadcast we hold for this hull — we keep no position history, so this is a point-in-time posture, not a dwell inference. Derived in-house from our own AIS feed; weight it by the broadcast age above.
Composite Risk
Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.
A coverage-weighted blend of the 3 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.
Estimated
Tanker · summer draught 6 m · 24.7 t per cm immersion
Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight regression) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.
density DWT/GT=1.24 is consistent with declared tanker
Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.
Transparency
Behavioural flags raised against this vessel — each shown with the raw evidence behind it. Derived in-house from data we are entitled to publish; informational, not a determination of wrongdoing.
Stopped transmitting relative to the live feed front
Method: gap measured vs the live feed's own max timestamp, not wall-clock. Source: TheMaritime aisstream.io ingest (ais_positions).
Signals are a current-state view: a flag clears once the vessel stops tripping its detector. These are screening indicators, not a substitute for your own due diligence.
Commercial

Visual Archive
Explore More