TheMaritime.net
Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%
Chemical Tanker🇹🇻 TuvaluActive

MELATI SATU

IMO
9123659
Call Sign
T2MF4

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage
22,254GT
Deadweight
32,127DWT
Length Overall
177.15m
Beam
30m
Draught
6m
Year Built
1997

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value
$6.2Mrange $6M$7.1M
$194/dwt · 32,127 dwt · built 1997
medium confidence · 7 comps
Comparable sales
VS REMLIN 2003 · $6MSW CAP FERRAT I 2001 · $7MSUNFLYTE 2001 · $11.5MFAVOLA 2002 · $7MZAGARA 2002 · $8MYASH 2002 · $8.2M
Second opinion±27% typical error
$8.1Mrange $5.4M$10.9M

An independent cross-check of the estimate above for Tanker (segment · size · age · market).

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Risk scoreMedium
64/ 100
Safety48
Compliance93
Environment48
Carbon intensity · estimatedC

This ship has no verified emissions report. We estimate a band C from its segment, size and age (81% confidence).

Estimate, not a reported figure. Within one band 95% of the time on reported peers.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

68/100
Elevated riskLow confidence40% component coverage

Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.

PSC detentionsno data
Sanctions exposureno data
Dark-fleet signalno data
Hull age96
Flag register25

A coverage-weighted blend of the 2 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. This headline is flagged low-confidence (a thin or structural-only read) and should not be treated as a verdict. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtMedium confidence
~32,127t at summer draught

Tanker · summer draught 6 m · 41.2 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught
4.2 m~24,714 t
4.5 m~25,950 t
4.8 m~27,185 t
5.1 m~28,421 t
5.4 m~29,656 t
5.7 m~30,892 t
6 m~32,127 t

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight regression) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classification
Declared
Tanker
Inferred from size
Tanker

density DWT/GT=1.44 is consistent with declared tanker

DWT/GT 1.44Beam/LOA 0.169Declared type: Chemical Tanker

Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Commercial

Voyage Estimate

From 32,127 DWT · ~24 t/day · bunker @ live VLSFO.

Explore More

Similar Vessels

Community

Vessel Comments