TheMaritime.net
Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%
Oil or Chemical Tanker🇪🇨 EcuadorActive

MARIA DEL CARMEN IX

Built by CSSC Offshore & Marine Engineering Company in 2014

IMO
9670937
MMSI
735059991
Call Sign
HC6390

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage
25,026GT
Deadweight
39,826DWT
Length Overall
183.2m
Beam
30.99m
Year Built
2014

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value
$24.7Mrange $17.4M$33.9M
$620/dwt · 39,826 dwt · built 2014
high confidence · 60 comps
Comparable sales
KIRSTEN MAERSK 2010 · $22MNINA 2010 · $24MALLEGRA 2009 · $24MECO REVOLUTION 2016 · $32MECO FLEET 2015 · $30MHAFNIA TORRES 2016 · $31M
Second opinion±27% typical error
$32.3Mrange $27.9M$33.5M

An independent cross-check of the estimate above for Tanker (segment · size · age · market).

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Risk scoreLow
84/ 100
Safety78
Compliance95
Environment78
Carbon intensity · estimatedC

This ship has no verified emissions report. We estimate a band C from its segment, size and age (44% confidence).

Estimate, not a reported figure. Within one band 95% of the time on reported peers.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

27/100
Moderate riskLow confidence40% component coverage

Some elevated factors — typically age or a lower-graded flag — but no acute ship-specific flag.

PSC detentionsno data
Sanctions exposureno data
Dark-fleet signalno data
Hull age28
Flag register25

A coverage-weighted blend of the 2 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. This headline is flagged low-confidence (a thin or structural-only read) and should not be treated as a verdict. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtMedium confidence
~39,826t at summer draught

Tanker · summer draught 10.71 m · 47.6 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught
7.5 m~24,538 t
8.03 m~27,086 t
8.57 m~29,634 t
9.11 m~32,182 t
9.64 m~34,730 t
10.18 m~37,278 t
10.71 m~39,826 t
Design draught looks implausible for this class and size — the figures above are anchored to it, so treat them with extra caution.

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight only) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classification
Declared
Tanker
Inferred from size
Tanker

density DWT/GT=1.59 is consistent with declared tanker

DWT/GT 1.59Beam/LOA 0.169Declared type: Oil or Chemical Tanker

Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Commercial

Voyage Estimate

From 39,826 DWT · ~24 t/day · bunker @ live VLSFO.

Explore More

Similar Vessels

Community

Vessel Comments