
One vessel, every compliance signal in one place: sanctions exposure path, composite risk, dark-fleet behaviour, flag history and safety record.
No sanctions exposure was found, but the composite risk read is elevated. See the breakdown below.
Sanctions exposure screens the hull and its ownership chain against official OFAC, EU, UN and UK designations, then propagates a sanctioned owner or parent down to the vessels it controls. The composite risk read blends age, flag register, port-state detentions, dark-fleet behaviour and sanctions exposure, weighted by how much evidence is present. Every signal shows its own evidence. This is decision support for a compliance review, not a legal determination.
Composite Risk
Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.
A coverage-weighted blend of the 4 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.
Transparency
Behavioural flags raised against this vessel — each shown with the raw evidence behind it. Derived in-house from data we are entitled to publish; informational, not a determination of wrongdoing.
Stopped transmitting relative to the live feed front
Method: gap measured vs the live feed's own max timestamp, not wall-clock. Source: TheMaritime aisstream.io ingest (ais_positions).
Signals are a current-state view: a flag clears once the vessel stops tripping its detector. These are screening indicators, not a substitute for your own due diligence.
Compliance
On 11 February 2026, the bulk carrier "BARNACLE", while under the conduct of a pilot, reported having intermittent issues with its main engine cooling system on Lac Saint-Pierre, QC. The propulsion was lost and restored twice, and the crew resolved the sea water suction issue while underway.
On 22 April 2025, the bulk carrier "BARNACLE", with 23 people on board and while under conduct of a pilot, reported having struck the west side upper approach wall of the lock 8 while transiting downbound in the Welland Canal, ON. After the vessel was secured in the lock 8, the crew assessed for damages and found buckled frames in the port side water ballast tank number 1. There was no water ingress, and the ship continued its voyage.
On 05 July 2024, the bulk carrier "BARNACLE", while under the conduct of a pilot, reported having sustained a total engine failure upon arrival at an anchorage off Longueuil, QC. The vessel was anchored and the crew resolved the issue.
On 24 October 2012, a crew member onboard the bulk carrier "BARNACLE" was fatally injured when he was hit by the starboard landing boom mast, off Grande-Vallée, Québec.
Recorded marine occurrences naming this vessel.
Appliances (general
Port-State-Control detentions.