Oil or Chemical Tanker🇧🇧 BarbadosActive

ALPS

Compare

IMO: 9286451
MMSI: 314001010
Call Sign: 8P2543

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage

6,522GT

Deadweight

10,127DWT

Length Overall

118.37m

Beam

19m

Draught

Year Built

2004

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value

$8.1Mrange $6.4M – $8.5M

$800/dwt · 10,127 dwt · built 2004

high confidence · 18 comps

Comparable sales

JM SUTERA 6 2010 · $7MALMA MARINE 2010 · $8.5MFORTUNE SWAN 2006 · $9.2MVS LARA 2006 · $6MLARISA 2003 · $7.5MPHILIPPA 2000 · $4.8M

Second opinion±27% typical error

$7Mrange $5.1M – $8.6M

An independent cross-check of the estimate above for Tanker (segment · size · age · market).

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Risk scoreMedium

67/ 100

Safety58

Compliance84

Environment58

Carbon intensity · estimatedD

This ship has no verified emissions report. We estimate a band D from its segment, size and age (57% confidence).

Estimate, not a reported figure. Within one band 95% of the time on reported peers.

Compliance

Safety Record

Marine casualties2

TOTAL FAILURE OF ANY MACHINERY OR TECHNICAL SYSTEMMinor
Mar 1, 2014Baie-des-Rochers, QC, QUEBEC (QC)
On 01 March 2014, the MV "HARBOUR LEADER" sustained a complete power failure whilst transiting upbound the St. Lawrence River off Baie-des-Rochers, QC. The vessel later resumed its voyage. No injuries or pollution reported.
TOTAL FAILURE OF ANY MACHINERY OR TECHNICAL SYSTEMMinor
Sep 27, 2007STE-CROIX, QC, QUEBEC (QC)
On 27 September 2007, near buoy Q-48, the upbound vessel CLIPPER LEADER took a sudden shear to port and had to go to emergency anchorage. Electronic problems in the steering system were reported.

Recorded marine occurrences naming this vessel.

Port-State-Control detentions1

Mobile, Alabama3 deficiencies
Mar 14, 2019US Coast Guard (Tokyo MOU)3 grounds for detention
Operational readiness of; Other (fire safety) Electrical installations shall be such as to minimize the; Electrical installations in

Port-State-Control detentions.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

49/100

Moderate risk60% component coverage

Some elevated factors — typically age or a lower-graded flag — but no acute ship-specific flag.

PSC detentions47

Sanctions exposureno data

Dark-fleet signalno data

Hull age68

Flag register25

A coverage-weighted blend of the 3 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtHigh confidence

~10,127t at summer draught

Tanker · summer draught 8 m · 16.8 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught

5.6 m~6,097 t

6 m~6,769 t

6.4 m~7,440 t

6.8 m~8,112 t

7.2 m~8,784 t

7.6 m~9,455 t

8 m~10,127 t

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (hull geometry) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classification

Declared

Tanker

→

Inferred from size

Tanker

density DWT/GT=1.55 is consistent with declared tanker

DWT/GT 1.55Beam/LOA 0.161Declared type: Oil or Chemical Tanker

Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Commercial