Oil Products Tanker🇬🇦 GabonActive

YI DING 9

Compare

IMO: 1024675
MMSI: 626329000
Call Sign: TRAZ8

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage

2,317GT

Deadweight

5,463DWT

Length Overall

96m

Beam

14m

Year Built

2006

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value

$5.2Mrange $4.7M – $5.2M

$953/dwt · 5,463 dwt · built 2006

low confidence · 2 comps

Comparable sales

AGARTHA 2003 · $4MDING HENG 2 2007 · $4M

Second opinion±27% typical error

$5.9Mrange $3.6M – $8.1M

An independent cross-check of the estimate above for Tanker (segment · size · age · market).

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Risk scoreMedium

74/ 100

Safety68

Compliance84

Environment68

Carbon intensity · estimatedE

This ship has no verified emissions report. We estimate a band E from its segment, size and age (100% confidence).

Estimate, not a reported figure. Within one band 95% of the time on reported peers.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

61/100

Elevated risk60% component coverage

Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.

PSC detentionsno data

Sanctions exposureno data

Dark-fleet signal80

Hull age60

Flag register25

A coverage-weighted blend of the 3 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtMedium confidence

~5,463t at summer draught

Tanker · summer draught 5.77 m · 12.5 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught

4.04 m~3,292 t

4.33 m~3,654 t

4.62 m~4,015 t

4.91 m~4,377 t

5.2 m~4,739 t

5.48 m~5,101 t

5.77 m~5,463 t

Design draught looks implausible for this class and size — the figures above are anchored to it, so treat them with extra caution.

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight only) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classificationConflict

Declared

Tanker

→

Inferred from size

Tanker

density DWT/GT=2.36 is physically implausible for any cargo ship (declared tanker) — likely a tonnage data error

DWT/GT 2.36Beam/LOA 0.146Declared type: Oil Products Tanker

The declared type conflicts with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals — a possible mis-declaration. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Transparency

Risk signals

Behavioural flags raised against this vessel — each shown with the raw evidence behind it. Derived in-house from data we are entitled to publish; informational, not a determination of wrongdoing.

Type vs. size mismatchhighstrength 0.95

Declared type contradicts the size-implied class

Jun 23, 2026

Audit Confidence: 0.95
Beam Loa Ratio: 0.146
Deadweight: 5,463
Declared Class: TANKER
Declared Type: Oil Products Tanker
Dwt Gt Ratio: 2.358
Gross Tonnage: 2,317
Reason: density DWT/GT=2.36 is physically implausible for any cargo ship (declared tanker) — likely a tonnage data error
Size Implied Class: TANKER

Method: declared type vs size-implied class (DWT/GT density + beam/LOA fullness). Source: vessel_type_audit (sibling P3#3 job; shared coarse_class classifier).

Signals are a current-state view: a flag clears once the vessel stops tripping its detector. These are screening indicators, not a substitute for your own due diligence.

Commercial