TheMaritime.net
Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%
Oil Products Tanker🇵🇼 PalauActive

VS

IMO
9252292
Call Sign
T8A3859

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage
22,184GT
Deadweight
34,558DWT
Length Overall
171m
Beam
27.42m
Draught
7m
Year Built
2003

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value
$10.8Mrange $7.6M$14.5M
$313/dwt · 34,558 dwt · built 2003
high confidence · 33 comps
Comparable sales
VS REMLIN 2003 · $6MSW CAP FERRAT I 2001 · $7MEASTERLY JUPITER 2009 · $20MEASTERLY CANYON 2009 · $19MSAN SEBASTIAN 2007 · $13.5MSUNFLYTE 2001 · $11.5M
Second opinion±27% typical error
$10.9Mrange $6.8M$14M

An independent cross-check of the estimate above for Tanker (segment · size · age · market).

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Risk scoreMedium
65/ 100
Safety58
Compliance77
Environment58
Carbon intensity · estimatedE

This ship has no verified emissions report. We estimate a band E from its segment, size and age (63% confidence).

Estimate, not a reported figure. Within one band 95% of the time on reported peers.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

53/100
Elevated riskLow confidence40% component coverage

Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.

PSC detentionsno data
Sanctions exposureno data
Dark-fleet signalno data
Hull age72
Flag register25

A coverage-weighted blend of the 2 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. This headline is flagged low-confidence (a thin or structural-only read) and should not be treated as a verdict. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtMedium confidence
~34,558t at summer draught

Tanker · summer draught 7 m · 43.2 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught
4.9 m~25,476 t
5.25 m~26,990 t
5.6 m~28,503 t
5.95 m~30,017 t
6.3 m~31,531 t
6.65 m~33,044 t
7 m~34,558 t

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight regression) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classification
Declared
Tanker
Inferred from size
Tanker

density DWT/GT=1.56 is consistent with declared tanker

DWT/GT 1.56Beam/LOA 0.16Declared type: Oil Products Tanker

Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Commercial

Voyage Estimate

From 34,558 DWT · ~24 t/day · bunker @ live VLSFO.

Explore More

Similar Vessels

Community

Vessel Comments