VASILIY BOZHENKO

Compare

IMO: 8623999
MMSI: 272085000
Call Sign: URHP

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage

2,466GT

Deadweight

3,135DWT

Length Overall

114m

Beam

13m

Draught

3.6m

Year Built

1984

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Risk scoreHigh

58/ 100

Safety38

Compliance95

Environment38

Compliance

Safety Record

Port-State-Control detentions1

Souda21 deficiencies
Jul 3, 2024Paris MoU (THETIS)21 grounds for detention
ISM; Fire drills; Abandon ship drills; Fire detection and alarm system; Radar; Nautical publications; Charts; Lifeboats; Lifeboat inventory; Launching arrangements for survival craft; Type approval equipment; Personal equipment for fire safety; Ready availability of fire fighting equipment; Propulsion main engine; Auxiliary engine; Garbage shipboard handling; Covers (hatchway-, portable-, tarpaulins, etc.); Lighting (Working spaces); Galley, handlingroom (maintenance); Fire-dampers; Fire doors/openings in fire-resisting divisions

Port-State-Control detentions.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

77/100

High risk60% component coverage

Strong, corroborated adverse evidence — a detention, sanctions exposure or an AIS-gap / behavioural signal.

PSC detentions58

Sanctions exposureno data

AIS-gap & behaviourno data

Hull age100

Flag register100

A coverage-weighted blend of the 3 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtHigh confidence

~3,135t at summer draught

Other · summer draught 3.6 m · 13 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught

2.52 m~1,728 t

2.7 m~1,963 t

2.88 m~2,197 t

3.06 m~2,432 t

3.24 m~2,666 t

3.42 m~2,901 t

3.6 m~3,135 t

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (hull geometry) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Full compliance dossier

Commercial