USKO MFU

Compare

IMO: 7919781
MMSI: 613101900
Call Sign: TJM0080

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage

2,654GT

Deadweight

4,244DWT

Length Overall

93.65m

Beam

13m

Draught

3.4m

Year Built

1982

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Risk scoreCritical

37/ 100

Safety38

Compliance35

Environment38

Compliance

Safety Record

Port-State-Control detentions2

Constanta19 deficiencies
Jul 25, 2023Paris MoU (THETIS)6 grounds for detention
International Oil Pollution Prevention (IOPP); International Air Pollution Cert.; SART/AIS-SART; Nautical publications; Fire drills; ISM
Olbia22 deficiencies
Aug 17, 2021Paris MoU (THETIS)10 grounds for detention
Cargo Ship Safety Equipment (including exemption); Atmosphere testing instrument; Remote Means of control (opening,pumps,ventilation,etc.) Machinery spaces; Emergency fire pump and its pipes; Fire-dampers; Rescue boats; Launching arrangements for rescue boats; Fire pumps and its pipes; Other (alarms); Embarkation arrangement survival craft

Port-State-Control detentions.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

94/100

High risk60% component coverage

Strong, corroborated adverse evidence — a detention, sanctions exposure or an AIS-gap / behavioural signal.

PSC detentions88

Sanctions exposureno data

AIS-gap & behaviourno data

Hull age100

Flag register100

A coverage-weighted blend of the 3 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtMedium confidence

~4,244t at summer draught

Other · summer draught 3.4 m · 12.3 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught

2.38 m~2,991 t

2.55 m~3,200 t

2.72 m~3,409 t

2.89 m~3,618 t

3.06 m~3,826 t

3.23 m~4,035 t

3.4 m~4,244 t

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight regression) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Full compliance dossier

Commercial