
One vessel, every compliance signal in one place: sanctions exposure path, composite risk, dark-fleet behaviour, flag history and safety record.
Screened against official OFAC, EU, UN and UK designations. Composite risk is low.
Composite Risk
No strong adverse signal on the components we could read for this hull.
Sanctions exposure screens the hull and its ownership chain against official OFAC, EU, UN and UK designations, then propagates a sanctioned owner or parent down to the vessels it controls. The composite risk read blends age, flag register, port-state detentions, dark-fleet behaviour and sanctions exposure, weighted by how much evidence is present. Every signal shows its own evidence. This is decision support for a compliance review, not a legal determination.
Screen the whole fleet on the risk boardA coverage-weighted blend of the single component we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. This headline is flagged low-confidence (a thin or structural-only read) and should not be treated as a verdict. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.
Transparency
Every recorded change of registered flag for this vessel. None of these changes matched a risk pattern. Re-flagging is a normal commercial act; this is an informational record, not a determination of wrongdoing.
Flag changes are taken verbatim from the vessel's recorded history; the “flagged” marker is a transparent rule over a public open-registry list and a documented re-flagging cadence, not a substitute for your own due diligence.