TheMaritime.net
Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%
Floating Storage or Production🇪🇸 SpainActive

SEAPEAK HISPANIA

Built by Hanwha Ocean in 2002

IMO
9230048
MMSI
224985000
Call Sign
C6JH5

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage
94,822GT
Deadweight
79,363DWT
Length Overall
279.8m
Beam
43.4m
Draught
9.4m
Year Built
2002

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value
$16.5Mrange $12.4M$21.4M
$208/dwt · 79,363 dwt · built 2002
high confidence · 34 comps
Comparable sales
HAFNIA SHINANO 2008 · $15MHAFNIA THAMES 2008 · $9.3MDANSHIP TOPE 2008 · $19MPELAGIC TOPE 2008 · $13.8MNAVE ARIADNE 2007 · $22.5MFAIR WORLD 2004 · $20.5M
Second opinion±27% typical error
$13.8Mrange $12.4M$18.5M

An independent cross-check of the estimate above for Tanker (segment · size · age · market).

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Risk scoreMedium
71/ 100
Safety58
Compliance95
Environment58
Carbon intensity · 2024E
32,562t CO₂
AER (CO₂/capacity·nm)
36.2
Fuel burned
11,443 t
Technical
EEXI (7.51 gCO₂/t·nm)

Verified reported figure. Band is peer-relative, not official IMO CII.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

48/100
Moderate risk60% component coverage

Some elevated factors — typically age or a lower-graded flag — but no acute ship-specific flag.

PSC detentionsno data
Sanctions exposureno data
Dark-fleet signal50
Hull age76
Flag register0

A coverage-weighted blend of the 3 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtHigh confidence
~79,363t at summer draught

Tanker · summer draught 9.4 m · 106.9 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught
6.58 m~49,209 t
7.05 m~54,234 t
7.52 m~59,260 t
7.99 m~64,286 t
8.46 m~69,312 t
8.93 m~74,337 t
9.4 m~79,363 t

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (hull geometry) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classificationConflict
Declared
Tanker
Inferred from size
Gas

declared tanker but density DWT/GT=0.84 is below the light-cargo cut 1.05 — under even a small bulker/tanker (typical >= 1.2); reads like a gas carrier or storage/FSO unit

DWT/GT 0.84Beam/LOA 0.155Declared type: Floating Storage or Production

The declared type conflicts with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals — a possible mis-declaration. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Transparency

Risk signals

Behavioural flags raised against this vessel — each shown with the raw evidence behind it. Derived in-house from data we are entitled to publish; informational, not a determination of wrongdoing.

Type vs. size mismatchmediumstrength 0.53

Declared type contradicts the size-implied class

Audit Confidence
0.533
Beam Loa Ratio
0.155
Deadweight
79,363
Declared Class
TANKER
Declared Type
Floating Storage or Production
Dwt Gt Ratio
0.837
Gross Tonnage
94,822
Reason
declared tanker but density DWT/GT=0.84 is below the light-cargo cut 1.05 — under even a small bulker/tanker (typical >= 1.2); reads like a gas carrier or storage/FSO unit
Size Implied Class
GAS

Method: declared type vs size-implied class (DWT/GT density + beam/LOA fullness). Source: vessel_type_audit (sibling P3#3 job; shared coarse_class classifier).

Signals are a current-state view: a flag clears once the vessel stops tripping its detector. These are screening indicators, not a substitute for your own due diligence.

Commercial

Voyage Estimate

From 79,363 DWT · ~30 t/day · bunker @ live VLSFO.

Explore More

Similar Vessels

Community

Vessel Comments