
One vessel, every compliance signal in one place: sanctions exposure path, composite risk, dark-fleet behaviour, flag history and safety record.
No sanctions exposure was found, but the composite risk read is elevated. See the breakdown below.
Sanctions exposure screens the hull and its ownership chain against official OFAC, EU, UN and UK designations, then propagates a sanctioned owner or parent down to the vessels it controls. The composite risk read blends age, flag register, port-state detentions, dark-fleet behaviour and sanctions exposure, weighted by how much evidence is present. Every signal shows its own evidence. This is decision support for a compliance review, not a legal determination.
Composite Risk
Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.
A coverage-weighted blend of the 3 components we could read for this hull; the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.
Transparency
Behavioural flags raised against this vessel, each shown with the raw evidence behind it. Derived in-house from data we are entitled to publish; informational, not a determination of wrongdoing.
Stopped transmitting relative to the live feed front
Method: gap measured vs the live feed's own max timestamp, not wall-clock. Source: TheMaritime aisstream.io ingest (ais_positions).
Signals are a current-state view: a flag clears once the vessel stops tripping its detector. These are screening indicators, not a substitute for your own due diligence.
Compliance
On 27 May 2026, the bulk carrier "RUDDY", while under the conduct of a pilot, reported a total engine failure and a subsequent loss of propulsion in Canal de Beauharnois, QC. The crew released both anchors and the engine was restarted before the vessel resumed its voyage.
On 22 June 2024, the bulk carrier "RUDDY", while under the conduct of a pilot, reported having sustained a total engine failure causing a loss of propulsion in Traverse du Nord, QC. The crew solved the issue and the vessel resumed its voyage.
On 29 November 2023, the bulk carrier "RUDDY" reported having sustained a total failure of its engine below Écluse de Côte-Sainte-Catherine, QC. The vessel was secured in the lock and the crew assessed the issue.
On 28 June 2022, the bulk carrier "RUDDY" reported sustaining multiple mechanical issues while transiting the Gulf of St. Lawrence off Les Îles-de-la-Madeleine, QC. The vessel continued its voyage to Québec, QC where the crew effected repairs.
On 20 December 2020, the bulk carrier "RUDDY" reported main engine problems on the St. Lawrence River. The vessel proceeded under its own power to the Les Rasades anchorage, QC, to assess the problem and carry out repairs.
On 24 July 2019, the bulk carrier "RUDDY" sustained a propulsion failure in Lock No.4 of the Welland Canal off Thorold, ON. The crew carried out the repairs and the vessel resumed its voyage.
On 11 April 2019, the bulk carrier "RUDDY" reported a machinery failure and had to anchor in the St. Lawrence River off Neuville, QC. The crew carried out repairs and the vessel resumed its voyage.
On 06 November 2018, the bulk carrier "RUDDY" sustained a main engine failure and stopped at the Lower Beauharnois Lock, QC. After repairs were made, the vessel continued its voyage.
Recorded marine occurrences naming this vessel.