Crude Oil Tanker🇴🇲 OmanActive

QASR

Compare

IMO: 9402471
MMSI: 461000282
Call Sign: A4FA6

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage

63,294GT

Deadweight

115,605DWT

Length Overall

250m

Beam

44.26m

Draught

8.5m

Year Built

2009

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value

$35.6Mrange $31.6M – $39.9M

$308/dwt · 115,605 dwt · built 2009

high confidence · 56 comps

Comparable sales

SEAQUEEN 2004 · $30MNISSOS DELOS 2012 · $45.3MSOUTHPORT 2008 · $35MFOS PICASSO 2009 · $40MAsia Ascend 2004 · $33MAMAX AVENUE 2010 · $39.5M

Second opinion±27% typical error

$45.5Mrange $39.4M – $56.5M

An independent cross-check of the estimate above for Tanker (segment · size · age · market).

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Risk scoreCritical

25/ 100

Safety68

Compliance5

Environment68

Carbon intensity · estimatedC

This ship has no verified emissions report. We estimate a band C from its segment, size and age (55% confidence).

Estimate, not a reported figure. Within one band 95% of the time on reported peers.

Compliance

Safety Record

Marine casualties1

RISK OF COLLISION (near collision) - With another vessel or other floating objectMinor
Oct 6, 2020Quebec City, QC, QUEBEC (QC)
On 06 October 2020, the crude oil tanker "FULMAR", under the conduct of a pilot, reported a close quarters situation with the sailboat "NO AGENDA II" off section 87 in the Port of Quebec City, QC.

Recorded marine occurrences naming this vessel.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

75/100

Elevated risk80% component coverage

Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.

PSC detentionsno data

Sanctions exposure100

Dark-fleet signal100

Hull age48

Flag register0

A coverage-weighted blend of the 4 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtMedium confidence

~115,605t at summer draught

Tanker · summer draught 8.5 m · 97.3 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught

5.95 m~90,802 t

6.38 m~94,936 t

6.8 m~99,070 t

7.23 m~103,203 t

7.65 m~107,337 t

8.08 m~111,471 t

8.5 m~115,605 t

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight regression) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classification

Declared

Tanker

→

Inferred from size

Tanker

density DWT/GT=1.83 is consistent with declared tanker

DWT/GT 1.83Beam/LOA 0.177Declared type: Crude Oil Tanker

Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Transparency

Risk signals

Behavioural flags raised against this vessel — each shown with the raw evidence behind it. Derived in-house from data we are entitled to publish; informational, not a determination of wrongdoing.

AIS gapcriticalstrength 1.00

Stopped transmitting relative to the live feed front

Jun 23, 2026

On Sanctions List: yes
Regimes: Australia,Canada,EU,Switzerland,UK

Method: vessel is on a sanctions list but has never appeared on our live AIS feed. Source: ais_positions (absence) + sanctioned_vessels.

Signals are a current-state view: a flag clears once the vessel stops tripping its detector. These are screening indicators, not a substitute for your own due diligence.

Commercial