NORTH STAR

Compare

IMO: 9299563
MMSI: 314109000
Call Sign: 8PPB

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage

40,690GT

Deadweight

72,807DWT

Length Overall

228.6m

Beam

32.25m

Year Built

2005

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value

$19Mrange $12.5M – $21.4M

$261/dwt · 72,807 dwt · built 2005

high confidence · 55 comps

Comparable sales

MADI 2005 · $10.5MPGC COMPANION 2005 · $10MTaurus 2006 · $12.5MCHEMTRANS TAURUS 2006 · $12.5MM/T PAN CAKE 2006 · $19MPAN CAKE 2006 · $19M

Second opinion±24% typical error

$18Mrange $12.9M – $24.6M

Value drivers & depreciation

How a hull like this loses value with age (today's market). The dot marks this ship at 21 yrs.

Typical tanker peer$30M

Age vs peer

−$11M

Size vs peer

−$1.3M

Model fit R² 0.40Typical error ±24%tested on 1,326 recent sales

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Open the full multi-model valuation

Risk scoreCritical

25/ 100

Safety40

Compliance95

Environment50

Carbon intensity · 2024C

3,612t CO₂

AER (CO₂/capacity·nm): 4.6
Fuel burned: 1,149 t
Technical: EEXI (4.14 gCO₂/t·nm)

Verified reported figure. Band is peer-relative, not official IMO CII.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

92/100

High risk80% component coverage

Strong, corroborated adverse evidence — a detention, sanctions exposure or an AIS-gap / behavioural signal.

PSC detentionsno data

Sanctions exposure100

AIS-gap & behaviour100

Hull age64

Flag register100

A coverage-weighted blend of the 4 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Sanctions exposure

critical

This vessel is directly sanctioned.

Regimes

OFAC

Chain depth

Hull listed

Confidence

verified

Evidence

imo: 9299563
list source: official:EU+OFAC+UK+UN
listed as: NORTH STAR
method: vessel IMO is directly on an official sanctions list
path: vessel_listed
programs: IRAN-EO13902

Screened against official OFAC, EU, UN and UK designations (In-house derivation over the OpenSanctions publishable subset, GLEIF LEI (CC0) and our own vessel/owner master. No new external source fetched.). An automated exposure signal for review, not a legal determination.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtMedium confidence

~72,807t at summer draught

Tanker · summer draught 12.93 m · 71.3 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught

9.05 m~45,148 t

9.7 m~49,758 t

10.34 m~54,368 t

10.99 m~58,978 t

11.64 m~63,587 t

12.28 m~68,197 t

12.93 m~72,807 t

Design draught looks implausible for this class and size — the figures above are anchored to it, so treat them with extra caution.

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight only) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classification

Declared

Tanker

→

Inferred from size

Tanker

density DWT/GT=1.79 is consistent with declared tanker

DWT/GT 1.79Beam/LOA 0.141Declared type: Crude Oil Tanker

Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Transparency

Risk signals

Behavioural flags raised against this vessel — each shown with the raw evidence behind it. Derived in-house from data we are entitled to publish; informational, not a determination of wrongdoing.

AIS gapcriticalstrength 1.00

Stopped transmitting relative to the live feed front

Jun 23, 2026

On Sanctions List: yes
Regimes: OFAC

Method: vessel is on a sanctions list but has never appeared on our live AIS feed. Source: ais_positions (absence) + sanctioned_vessels.

Signals are a current-state view: a flag clears once the vessel stops tripping its detector. These are screening indicators, not a substitute for your own due diligence.

Full compliance dossier

Commercial