
Technical Specifications
Intelligence
Compliance
Charts; Voyage or passage plan; Signalling lamp; Magnetic compass; Evaluation of crew performance (fire drills); Hull - corrosion; Embarkation arrangements rescue boats; Lifejackets incl.provision and disposition; UMS - alarms; Propulsion main engine; Cleanliness of engine room; Emergency, lighting,batteries and switches; Freeboard marks; Fire-dampers; Marking of IMO number; Cargo & other hatchways; Anchoring devices; Bilge pumping arrangements; Auxiliary engine
Port-State-Control detentions.
Composite Risk
Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.
A coverage-weighted blend of the 2 components we could read for this hull; the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.
Estimated
Tanker · summer draught 5.2 m · 3.2 t per cm immersion
Estimate only: modelled from deadweight (deadweight regression) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.
density DWT/GT=1.50 is consistent with declared tanker
Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.
Commercial
Price it in the Route Planner between any two commercial ports: ballast and laden legs, two fuels at live bunker prices, port and canal costs, the weather on the way, and the TCE set against the market.
Typical Small tanker speed and burn. Replace them with the ship's own figures in the planner.
Explore More