
Technical Specifications
Intelligence
Compliance
Charts; Voyage or passage plan; Signalling lamp; Magnetic compass; Evaluation of crew performance (fire drills); Hull - corrosion; Embarkation arrangements rescue boats; Lifejackets incl.provision and disposition; UMS - alarms; Propulsion main engine; Cleanliness of engine room; Emergency, lighting,batteries and switches; Freeboard marks; Fire-dampers; Marking of IMO number; Cargo & other hatchways; Anchoring devices; Bilge pumping arrangements; Auxiliary engine
Port-State-Control detentions.
Composite Risk
Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.
A coverage-weighted blend of the 2 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.
Estimated
Tanker · summer draught 5.2 m · 3.2 t per cm immersion
Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight regression) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.
density DWT/GT=1.50 is consistent with declared tanker
Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.
Commercial
Explore More