MTT TAWAU

Compare

IMO: 9126869
MMSI: 620999279
Call Sign: D6A3278

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage

10,743GT

Deadweight

14,099DWT

Length Overall

162.92m

Beam

22.3m

Draught

5.3m

Year Built

1997

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value

$6Mrange $6M – $8.7M

$429/dwt · 14,099 dwt · built 1997

low confidence · 3 comps

Comparable sales

APOLLO TRADER 2003 · $11MHE SHENG 2002 · $5.5MNITHI BHUM 2002 · $5M

Second opinion±59% typical error

$5.8Mrange $5.1M – $12.4M

Value drivers & depreciation

Container value vs. age (typical size & today's market).

Typical container peer$20M

Age vs peer

−$11M

Size vs peer

−$8M

Model fit R² 0.47Typical error ±59%tested on 147 recent sales

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Open the full multi-model valuation

Risk scoreMedium

64/ 100

Safety48

Compliance95

Environment48

Carbon intensity · estimatedD

This ship has no verified emissions report. We estimate a band D from its segment, size and age (77% confidence).

Estimate, not a reported figure. Within one band 95% of the time on reported peers.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

87/100

High risk40% component coverage

Strong, corroborated adverse evidence — a detention, sanctions exposure or an AIS-gap / behavioural signal.

PSC detentionsno data

Sanctions exposureno data

AIS-gap & behaviour80

Hull age96

Flag registerno data

A coverage-weighted blend of the 2 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtMedium confidence

~14,099t at summer draught

Container · summer draught 5.3 m · 28.7 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught

3.71 m~9,535 t

3.97 m~10,295 t

4.24 m~11,056 t

4.51 m~11,817 t

4.77 m~12,578 t

5.03 m~13,338 t

5.3 m~14,099 t

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight regression) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classification

Declared

Container

→

Inferred from size

Container

density DWT/GT=1.31 is consistent with declared container

DWT/GT 1.31Beam/LOA 0.137Declared type: Container Ship

Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Transparency

Risk signals

Behavioural flags raised against this vessel — each shown with the raw evidence behind it. Derived in-house from data we are entitled to publish; informational, not a determination of wrongdoing.

Flag hoppinghighstrength 0.70

Repeated flag changes or an MMSI-country vs. registered-flag mismatch

Jun 23, 2026

Has Imo: yes
Mid: 620
Mmsi: 620999279
Mmsi Mid Flag: Comoros
Mmsi Mid Flag Iso: KM
Registered Flag: Malaysia
Registered Flag Iso: MY

Method: broadcast MMSI MID maps to a different country than the registered flag. Source: vessel_flag_discrepancies (in-house MID vs flag derivation).

Signals are a current-state view: a flag clears once the vessel stops tripping its detector. These are screening indicators, not a substitute for your own due diligence.

Full compliance dossier

Commercial