
One vessel, every compliance signal in one place: sanctions exposure path, composite risk, dark-fleet behaviour, flag history and safety record.
No sanctions exposure was found, but the composite risk read is elevated. See the breakdown below.
Sanctions exposure screens the hull and its ownership chain against official OFAC, EU, UN and UK designations, then propagates a sanctioned owner or parent down to the vessels it controls. The composite risk read blends age, flag register, port-state detentions, dark-fleet behaviour and sanctions exposure, weighted by how much evidence is present. Every signal shows its own evidence. This is decision support for a compliance review, not a legal determination.
Composite Risk
Strong, corroborated adverse evidence — a detention, sanctions exposure or an AIS-gap / behavioural signal.
A coverage-weighted blend of the 3 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.
Transparency
Behavioural flags raised against this vessel — each shown with the raw evidence behind it. Derived in-house from data we are entitled to publish; informational, not a determination of wrongdoing.
Stopped transmitting relative to the live feed front
Method: gap measured vs the live feed's own max timestamp, not wall-clock. Source: TheMaritime aisstream.io ingest (ais_positions).
Signals are a current-state view: a flag clears once the vessel stops tripping its detector. These are screening indicators, not a substitute for your own due diligence.
Compliance
On 25 July 2026, the general cargo "MITIQ", while under the conduct of a pilot, reported having experienced a close-quarters situation with the sailing vessel "BIPASHA" off Pointe à la Citrouille, QC
On 11 July 2019, the cargo vessel "MITIQ" experienced a problem with the vessel's main engine in the St. Lawrence River near Varennes, QC and proceeded to the anchorage. The crew carried out repairs and the vessel resumed its voyage.
On 20 September 2016, the general cargo vessel "MITIQ" reported a breakdown of the cargo crane during cargo operations at berth, Port of Valleyfield, QC.
On 17 August 2016, the general cargo vessel "MITIQ" reported a close quarters situation with the pleasure craft "C24801QC". The vessel had to take evasive actions to avoid the collision.
On 30 September 2015, the general cargo "MITIQ" struck a protection pillar for one of the vacuum pads of the lock at St. Lambert, QC while mooring inside the lock. The vessel sustained damage, but no damage to the lock was reported.
On 28 October 2014, the general cargo vessel "MITIQ", while anchored off Arviat, Nunavut, reported having an injured crewmember. The crewmember was sent to the hospital for his injuries. No damage or pollution reported.
On 01 October 2014, the general cargo vessel "MITIQ" reported an injured stevedore while being alongside the dock in Salaberry-de-Valleyfield, Quebec. The casualty was sent to the hospital with a fracture to the left leg. No damage or pollution reported.
Recorded marine occurrences naming this vessel.