
One vessel, every compliance signal in one place: sanctions exposure path, composite risk, dark-fleet behaviour, flag history and safety record.
No sanctions exposure was found, but the composite risk read is elevated. See the breakdown below.
Sanctions exposure screens the hull and its ownership chain against official OFAC, EU, UN and UK designations, then propagates a sanctioned owner or parent down to the vessels it controls. The composite risk read blends age, flag register, port-state detentions, dark-fleet behaviour and sanctions exposure, weighted by how much evidence is present. Every signal shows its own evidence. This is decision support for a compliance review, not a legal determination.
Composite Risk
Strong, corroborated adverse evidence — a detention, sanctions exposure or an AIS-gap / behavioural signal.
A coverage-weighted blend of the 3 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.
Compliance
On 17 December 2020, the general cargo vessel "MARGARETHA" reported the failure of its main engine in the Gulf of St. Lawrence north of Anticosti Island, QC. The vessel drifted while the crew carried out repairs and then resumed the voyage.
Recorded marine occurrences naming this vessel.
Ballast, fuel and other tanks; Fire detection and alarm system; Rescue boats; Cargo & other hatchways; Endorsement by flagstate; Ready availability of fire fighting equipment; Manholes/flush scuttles; Lifebuoys incl. provision and disposition; Ventilators, air pipes, casings
Port-State-Control detentions.