MACKEREL

Built by HD Hyundai Mipo in 2002

Compare

IMO: 9236755
MMSI: 629009376
Call Sign: C5J388

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage

23,241GT

Deadweight

39,480DWT

Length Overall

182.55m

Beam

27.4m

Draught

7.5m

Year Built

2002

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value

$12.3Mrange $8.7M – $14.3M

$311/dwt · 39,480 dwt · built 2002

high confidence · 59 comps

Comparable sales

PRELUDE 2007 · $14MMARINER A 2005 · $12MVALLE DI CORDOBA 2005 · $12.5MVALLE DI GRANADA 2005 · $13.4MChrysopigi 2006 · $9MCHRYСОPIGI 2006 · $9M

Second opinion±24% typical error

$9Mrange $8.2M – $17M

Value drivers & depreciation

How a hull like this loses value with age (today's market). The dot marks this ship at 24 yrs.

Typical tanker peer$30M

Age vs peer

−$14M

Size vs peer

−$6.7M

Model fit R² 0.40Typical error ±24%tested on 1,326 recent sales

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Open the full multi-model valuation

Risk scoreHigh

50/ 100

Safety58

Compliance35

Environment58

Carbon intensity · estimatedD

This ship has no verified emissions report. We estimate a band D from its segment, size and age (53% confidence).

Estimate, not a reported figure. Within one band 95% of the time on reported peers.

Compliance

Safety Record

Port-State-Control detentions1

Marsaxlokk8 deficiencies
Nov 20, 2023Paris MoU (THETIS)6 grounds for detention
Fire doors/openings in fire-resisting divisions; Fire detection and alarm system; Fire drills; Abandon ship drills; Manning specified by the minimum safe manning doc; ISM

Port-State-Control detentions.

Build Series

Sister Vessels

1 sister

HD Hyundai Mipo · TANKER · 2002 · 2-hull series

RADHIKA

Built 200240,218 DWTIMO 9251547

Sister hulls share a yard, segment, build year (±1) and deadweight (±3%) — the cleanest comparables for valuation. Derived in-house from our fleet register; coverage is limited to hulls carrying a recorded builder, so a series may be incomplete.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

66/100

Elevated risk60% component coverage

Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.

PSC detentions50

Sanctions exposureno data

AIS-gap & behaviourno data

Hull age76

Flag register100

A coverage-weighted blend of the 3 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtMedium confidence

~39,480t at summer draught

Tanker · summer draught 7.5 m · 47.3 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught

5.25 m~28,840 t

5.63 m~30,613 t

6 m~32,387 t

6.38 m~34,160 t

6.75 m~35,933 t

7.13 m~37,707 t

7.5 m~39,480 t

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight regression) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classification

Declared

Tanker

→

Inferred from size

Tanker

density DWT/GT=1.70 is consistent with declared tanker

DWT/GT 1.7Beam/LOA 0.15Declared type: Crude Oil Tanker

Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Full compliance dossier

Commercial