JIN LONG 89

Compare

MMSI: 201006210
Call Sign: 63967

Composite Risk

Risk Score

74/100

Elevated riskLow confidence20% component coverage

Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.

PSC detentionsno data

Sanctions exposureno data

AIS-gap & behaviourno data

Hull ageno data

Flag register100

A coverage-weighted blend of the single component we could read for this hull; the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. This headline is flagged low-confidence (a thin or structural-only read) and should not be treated as a verdict. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Transparency

Flag history

Every recorded change of registered flag for this vessel. None of these changes matched a risk pattern. Re-flagging is a normal commercial act; this is an informational record, not a determination of wrongdoing.

Japan→Germany
Sep 26, 2018
Source: Equasis.

Flag changes are taken verbatim from the vessel's recorded history; the “flagged” marker is a transparent rule over a public open-registry list and a documented re-flagging cadence, not a substitute for your own due diligence.

Full compliance dossier

Commercial

Voyage Planning

Plan a voyage for this ship

Price it in the Route Planner between any two commercial ports: ballast and laden legs, two fuels at live bunker prices, port and canal costs, the weather on the way, and the TCE set against the market.