JENS MAERSK

Built by Volkswerft in 2001

Compare

IMO: 9215177
MMSI: 219974000
Call Sign: OYYK2

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage

30,166GT

Deadweight

35,097DWT

Length Overall

216.3m

Beam

32.25m

Draught

9.7m

Year Built

2001

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value

$13.9Mrange $10.3M – $18M

$395/dwt · 35,097 dwt · built 2001

high confidence · 9 comps

Comparable sales

BUXFAVOURITE 1997 · $10MSTRAIT MAS 2002 · $19MNAJADE 2007 · $20MBF TIGER 2006 · $20MNEWNEW MOON 1999 · $10.5MAS ANGELINA 2007 · $17M

Second opinion±59% typical error

$11.6Mrange $6.2M – $24.8M

Value drivers & depreciation

How a hull like this loses value with age (today's market). The dot marks this ship at 25 yrs.

Typical container peer$20M

Age vs peer

−$9.5M

Size vs peer

+$3.6M

Model fit R² 0.47Typical error ±59%tested on 147 recent sales

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Open the full multi-model valuation

Risk scoreMedium

71/ 100

Safety58

Compliance95

Environment58

Carbon intensity · estimatedC

This ship has no verified emissions report. We estimate a band C from its segment, size and age (74% confidence).

Estimate, not a reported figure. Within one band 95% of the time on reported peers.

Compliance

Safety Record

Marine casualties1

Personnel CasualtySerious
May 11, 2021Victoria, BRITISH COLUMBIA (BC)
On 11 May 2021, the container vessel "JENS MAERSK", while under the conduct of a pilot and while transiting the Juan de Fuca Strait near Victoria, BC, reported one of its crew members having been seriously injured. The injured crew member was evacuated and brought to a nearby hospital.

Recorded marine occurrences naming this vessel.

Build Series

Sister Vessels

1 sister

Volkswerft · CONTAINER · 2001–2002 · 2-hull series

JOSEPHINE MAERSK

Built 200235,082 DWTIMO 9215191

Sister hulls share a yard, segment, build year (±1) and deadweight (±3%) — the cleanest comparables for valuation. Derived in-house from our fleet register; coverage is limited to hulls carrying a recorded builder, so a series may be incomplete.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

74/100

Elevated riskLow confidence40% component coverage

Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.

PSC detentionsno data

Sanctions exposureno data

AIS-gap & behaviourno data

Hull age80

Flag register100

A coverage-weighted blend of the 2 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. This headline is flagged low-confidence (a thin or structural-only read) and should not be treated as a verdict. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtHigh confidence

~35,097t at summer draught

Container · summer draught 9.7 m · 56.8 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught

6.79 m~18,566 t

7.27 m~21,321 t

7.76 m~24,076 t

8.25 m~26,831 t

8.73 m~29,587 t

9.21 m~32,342 t

9.7 m~35,097 t

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (hull geometry) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classification

Declared

Container

→

Inferred from size

Container

density DWT/GT=1.16 is consistent with declared container

DWT/GT 1.16Beam/LOA 0.149Declared type: Container Ship

Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Full compliance dossier

Commercial