- IMO
- 9637222
- MMSI
- 441981000
- Call Sign
- D7DR
Technical Specifications
Key Figures
Live Tracking
Current Position
Where it waited most
Most time stopped at Port of Felixstowe — 2 d across 1 stay.
- 1
- 2Langeoog38 h
Derived from the AIS track — runs of near-zero speed (anchored, moored or drifting) snapped to the nearest port. Builds up as we observe the vessel.
Intelligence
Risk & Sustainability
- AER (CO₂/capacity·nm)
- 5.2
- Fuel burned
- 6,089 t
- Technical
- EEDI (8.63 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verified reported figure. Band is peer-relative, not official IMO CII.
- Port of Felixstowe2.1 dJun 26, 2026
- Tanger Med0.3 dJun 21, 2026
AIS-derived from our live feed.
Operational Status
Activity
Stopped, anchored or moored on its latest broadcast — parked, not necessarily withdrawn.
Read from the single most-recent AIS broadcast we hold for this hull — we keep no position history, so this is a point-in-time posture, not a dwell inference. Derived in-house from our own AIS feed; weight it by the broadcast age above.
Port calls
1 recent · AIS-detectedArrivals, time in port and the load/discharge inferred from the draught change — detected from AIS track history. An open call means the vessel is still in port (no departure observed yet).
- no cargo change→ · 2.1 days in port· draught 14.2→14.2 m
Method: each call is a run of fixes inside a port’s geofence confirmed by a stop (or an AIS gap); load/discharge is the sign of the draught delta over the call. Indicative — arrivals before our AIS history began read from the first observation.
Where it waits
1 port · 2.1 days totalTime-in-port summed by port from the AIS-detected port-call history — the ports this vessel has spent the most time at, longest first.
- Port of Felixstowe· United Kingdom2.1 days1 call · 2.1 days avg
Based on 1 completed call observed since — open calls (no departure yet) are excluded. The distribution sharpens as AIS history accrues.
Composite Risk
Risk Score
No strong adverse signal on the components we could read for this hull.
A coverage-weighted blend of the 2 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. This headline is flagged low-confidence (a thin or structural-only read) and should not be treated as a verdict. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.
Estimated
Capacity & Classification
Container · summer draught 10 m · 147.8 t per cm immersion
Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight regression) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.
density DWT/GT=1.02 is consistent with declared container
Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.
Commercial
Voyage Estimate
Visual Archive
Gallery
Explore More
Similar Vessels
Community
Vessel Comments