TheMaritime.net
Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%
General Cargo🇰🇲 ComorosActive

GOLDEN ROSE

Built by Tsuneishi Miho Shipbuilding in 1989

IMO
8801620
MMSI
620084000
Call Sign
D6A2084

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage
6,030GT
Deadweight
9,919DWT
Length Overall
113.12m
Beam
18.9m
Year Built
1989

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Risk scoreHigh
57/ 100
Safety38
Compliance93
Environment38
Carbon intensity · 2024D
669t CO₂
AER (CO₂/capacity·nm)
14.6
Fuel burned
212 t
Technical
EIV (11.81 gCO₂/t·nm)

Verified reported figure. Band is peer-relative, not official IMO CII.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

70/100
Elevated riskLow confidence40% component coverage

Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.

PSC detentionsno data
Sanctions exposureno data
Dark-fleet signalno data
Hull age100
Flag register25

A coverage-weighted blend of the 2 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. This headline is flagged low-confidence (a thin or structural-only read) and should not be treated as a verdict. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtMedium confidence
~9,919t at summer draught

Other · summer draught 7.01 m · 22.1 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught
4.9 m~5,278 t
5.25 m~6,052 t
5.6 m~6,825 t
5.96 m~7,599 t
6.31 m~8,372 t
6.66 m~9,146 t
7.01 m~9,919 t
Design draught looks implausible for this class and size — the figures above are anchored to it, so treat them with extra caution.

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight only) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Commercial

Voyage Estimate

From 9,919 DWT · ~9 t/day · bunker @ live VLSFO.

Explore More

Similar Vessels

Community

Vessel Comments