- IMO
- 9334351
- MMSI
- 636015646
- Call Sign
- A8NN6
Technical Specifications
Key Figures
Live Tracking
Current Position
Where it waited most
Most time stopped at Thorntonbank — 2 d across 7 stays.
- 1Thorntonbank2 d · 7×
- 2Halifax20 h
- 3
Derived from the AIS track — runs of near-zero speed (anchored, moored or drifting) snapped to the nearest port. Builds up as we observe the vessel.
Intelligence
Risk & Sustainability
Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.
- AER (CO₂/capacity·nm)
- 10.5
- Fuel burned
- 10,765 t
- Technical
- EEXI (14.33 gCO₂/t·nm)
Verified reported figure. Band is peer-relative, not official IMO CII.
Compliance
Safety Record
- RISK OF COLLISION (near collision) - With another vessel or other floating objectMinorMay 28, 2025Île d'Orléans, QUEBEC (QC)
On 28 May 2025, the container ship "EM KEA", while under the conduct of a pilot, reported having experienced a close quarters situation with the recreational craft "VATENA" off the east point of the Île d'Orléans, QC.
- TOTAL FAILURE OF ANY MACHINERY OR TECHNICAL SYSTEMMinorApr 27, 2025Port of Montreal, QC, QUEBEC (QC)
On 27 April 2025, the container ship "EM KEA", with 25 people on board and while under conduct of a pilot, reported having a failure of its main engine while berthing at the section 60 in the Port of Montreal, QC. The vessel continued his berthing operations with the assistance of a tug.
- TOTAL FAILURE OF ANY MACHINERY OR TECHNICAL SYSTEMMinorJun 19, 2024Montréal, QUEBEC (QC)
On 19 June 2024, the cargo vessel "EM KEA", while under the conduct of a pilot and assisted by 2 tugs for berthing, reported having sustained a total engine failure at section No. 60 of the Port de Montréal, QC. The vessel was secured and the crew assessed the issue.
- TOTAL FAILURE OF ANY MACHINERY OR TECHNICAL SYSTEMMinorMay 13, 2022Trois-Rivières, QUEBEC (QC)
On 13 May 2022, the container vessel "EM KEA", while under the conduct of a pilot, reported having sustained a machinery failure involving its main engine while transiting the St. Lawrence River off Trois-Rivières, QC. The crew carried out repairs and the vessel resumed its voyage.
- TOTAL FAILURE OF ANY MACHINERY OR TECHNICAL SYSTEMMinorJun 21, 2017Les Escoumins Pilot station, QC, QUEBEC (QC)
On 21 June 2017, the container vessel "EM KEA" reported as disabled due to a main engine failure, 7 nautical miles east of Les Escoumins pilot station, QC. The vessel cleared off the traffic lane and the crew members carried out repairs while the vessel was drifting. The vessel resumed its transit after repairs were carried out.
Recorded marine occurrences naming this vessel.
Operational Status
Activity
Stopped, anchored or moored on its latest broadcast — parked, not necessarily withdrawn.
Read from the single most-recent AIS broadcast we hold for this hull — we keep no position history, so this is a point-in-time posture, not a dwell inference. Derived in-house from our own AIS feed; weight it by the broadcast age above.
Port calls
1 recent · AIS-detectedArrivals, time in port and the load/discharge inferred from the draught change — detected from AIS track history. An open call means the vessel is still in port (no departure observed yet).
- no cargo change→ · 21 h in port· draught 10.1→10.6 m
Method: each call is a run of fixes inside a port’s geofence confirmed by a stop (or an AIS gap); load/discharge is the sign of the draught delta over the call. Indicative — arrivals before our AIS history began read from the first observation.
Where it waits
1 port · 21 h totalTime-in-port summed by port from the AIS-detected port-call history — the ports this vessel has spent the most time at, longest first.
- Halifax· Canada21 h1 call · 21 h avg
Based on 1 completed call observed since — open calls (no departure yet) are excluded. The distribution sharpens as AIS history accrues.
Composite Risk
Risk Score
Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.
A coverage-weighted blend of the 2 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. This headline is flagged low-confidence (a thin or structural-only read) and should not be treated as a verdict. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.
Estimated
Capacity & Classification
Container · summer draught 9.3 m · 61.9 t per cm immersion
Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight regression) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.
density DWT/GT=1.18 is consistent with declared container
Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.
Commercial
Voyage Estimate
Fleet Management
Ownership & Management
Visual Archive
Gallery
Explore More
Similar Vessels
Community
Vessel Comments