COSCO PRINCE RUPERT

Compare

IMO: 9448803
MMSI: 563278100
Call Sign: 9VMW3

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage

91,051GT

Deadweight

102,742DWT

Length Overall

334m

Beam

42.86m

Draught

12.1m

Year Built

2011

Live Tracking

Current Position

Live AIS · 2 d ago

Track · last 12 h

Position

1.224°N · 103.951°E

Speed

14.7 kn

Course

60°

Status

Under way using engine

Destination INNSAETA Aug 11, 07:30 PMLaden · 13.1 m

Where it waited most

Most time stopped at Port of Singapore — 24 h across 2 stays.

1
Port of Singapore24 h · 2×
2
Port of Shenzhen22 h
3
Offshore 31.11,123.143 h

Derived from the AIS track — runs of near-zero speed (anchored, moored or drifting) snapped to the nearest port. Builds up as we observe the vessel.

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value

$90.2Mrange $88.1M – $90.3M

$878/dwt · 102,742 dwt · built 2011

low confidence · 3 comps

Comparable sales

LOTUS A 2010 · $90MOOCL BRAZIL 2010 · $75.7MOOCL DURBAN 2011 · $79.3M

Second opinion±59% typical error

$57.3Mrange $36.8M – $65.8M

Value drivers & depreciation

How a hull like this loses value with age (today's market). The dot marks this ship at 15 yrs.

Typical container peer$20M

Age vs peer

+$1.8M

Size vs peer

+$36M

Model fit R² 0.47Typical error ±59%tested on 147 recent sales

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Open the full multi-model valuation

Risk scoreLow

84/ 100

Safety78

Compliance95

Environment78

Carbon intensity · estimatedB

This ship has no verified emissions report. We estimate a band B from its segment, size and age (68% confidence).

Estimate, not a reported figure. Within one band 95% of the time on reported peers.

Recent port calls

Pasir Panjang
Aug 4, 2026
1.0 d
Pulau Bukom
Aug 4, 2026
0.0 d
Mawan Pt
Jul 30, 2026
0.9 d
Port of Los Angeles
Jun 18, 2026
0.1 d

AIS-derived from our live feed.

Compliance

Safety Record

Marine casualties1

Not InvolvedModerate
Mar 20, 2018Berth 1, Kinder Morgan Terminal, Vancouver, BC, BRITISH COLUMBIA (BC)
On 20 March 2018, the bulk carrier "CHINA SPIRIT" reported that its mooring line parted while wharfing at Berth 1 in Kinder Morgan Terminal, Vancouver, BC due to the wake effect from the passing container vessel "COSCO PRINCE RUPERT". Additional damages were reported to the berth and the embarkation ladder from berth to "NORD PACIFIC", which was berthed at Berth 5 in the terminal, due to the same wake effect.

Recorded marine occurrences naming this vessel.

Operational Status

Activity

Status unknownLow confidenceFix 22 days ago

The latest broadcast is too stale or lacks the speed / status to classify.

Speed

9.9 kn

Nav status

Under way using engine

Last broadcast

22 days ago

Hull age

15 yr

Read from the single most-recent AIS broadcast we hold for this hull — we keep no position history, so this is a point-in-time posture, not a dwell inference. Derived in-house from our own AIS feed; weight it by the broadcast age above.

Port calls

2 recent · AIS-detected

Arrivals, time in port and the load/discharge inferred from the draught change — detected from AIS track history. An open call means the vessel is still in port (no departure observed yet).

Pasir Panjang
no cargo change
→ · 24 h in port· draught 13.1→13.1 m
Mawan Pt
Loaded
→ · 23 h in port· draught 10.7→13.1 m

Method: each call is a run of fixes inside a port’s geofence confirmed by a stop (or an AIS gap); load/discharge is the sign of the draught delta over the call. Indicative — arrivals before our AIS history began read from the first observation.

Where it waits

2 ports · 47 h total

Time-in-port summed by port from the AIS-detected port-call history — the ports this vessel has spent the most time at, longest first.

Pasir Panjang· Singapore
24 h
1 call · 24 h avg
Mawan Pt· China
23 h
1 call · 23 h avg 1 load

Based on 2 completed calls observed since — open calls (no departure yet) are excluded. The distribution sharpens as AIS history accrues.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

80/100

High risk80% component coverage

Strong, corroborated adverse evidence — a detention, sanctions exposure or an AIS-gap / behavioural signal.

PSC detentionsno data

Sanctions exposure80

AIS-gap & behaviour100

Hull age40

Flag register100

A coverage-weighted blend of the 4 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Sanctions exposure

high · inherited

Owned by a sanctioned entity.

Sanctioned entity

COSCO Shipping

Regimes

OFAC

Chain depth

1 step removed

Confidence

verified

Evidence

datasets: US DoD Chinese military companies
listed as: China COSCO SHIPPING Corporation Limited
method: vessel's registered owner is itself a sanctioned entity (vetted name-match FK)
owner: COSCO Shipping
owner id: 26
path: direct_owner

Screened against official OFAC, EU, UN and UK designations (In-house derivation over the OpenSanctions publishable subset, GLEIF LEI (CC0) and our own vessel/owner master. No new external source fetched.). An automated exposure signal for review, not a legal determination.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtHigh confidence

~102,742t at summer draught

Container · summer draught 12.1 m · 129.7 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught

8.47 m~55,670 t

9.08 m~63,516 t

9.68 m~71,361 t

10.29 m~79,206 t

10.89 m~87,051 t

11.5 m~94,897 t

12.1 m~102,742 t

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (hull geometry) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classification

Declared

Container

→

Inferred from size

Container

density DWT/GT=1.13 is consistent with declared container

DWT/GT 1.13Beam/LOA 0.128Declared type: Container Ship

Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Transparency

Risk signals

Behavioural flags raised against this vessel — each shown with the raw evidence behind it. Derived in-house from data we are entitled to publish; informational, not a determination of wrongdoing.

Old tonnage · sanctioned ownercriticalstrength 0.50

Ageing vessel under a sanctioned or sanctions-exposed owner

Jul 11, 2026

Age Threshold: 15
Age Years: 15
Owner: COSCO Shipping
Owner Is Sanctioned Entity: yes
Owner Sanctioned Entity Name: China COSCO SHIPPING Corporation Limited
Owner Sanctioned Vessels Operated: 0
Owner Sanctions Regimes: OFAC
Year Built: 2,011

Method: vessel age >= threshold AND owner is a sanctioned entity and/or operates sanctioned tonnage. Source: vessels (year_built/owner) + sanctioned_orgs + sanctioned_vessels.

AIS gaphighstrength 1.00

Stopped transmitting relative to the live feed front

Jun 23, 2026

Feed Front: Aug 27, 2026
Gap Days: 22.24
Last Fix: Aug 5, 2026
On Sanctions List: no
Threshold Days: 3

Method: gap measured vs the live feed's own max timestamp, not wall-clock. Source: TheMaritime aisstream.io ingest (ais_positions).

Signals are a current-state view: a flag clears once the vessel stops tripping its detector. These are screening indicators, not a substitute for your own due diligence.

Full compliance dossier

Commercial