TheMaritime.net
Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%
Crude Oil Tanker🇦🇼 ArubaActive

AZURE VOYAGER

Built by Hanwha Ocean in 1999

IMO
9181649
MMSI
307071000
Call Sign
P4AG06

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage
157,814GT
Deadweight
299,325DWT
Length Overall
332m
Beam
58m
Year Built
1999

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Estimated market value
$32.9Mrange $29.1M$36.9M
$110/dwt · 299,325 dwt · built 1999
high confidence · 16 comps
Comparable sales
AUSTRALIS 2003 · $20MNEW NAXOS 2003 · $33MNEW NAXOS 2003 · $33MNEW TINOS 2003 · $37MALRAYA 2005 · $45MSAKE 2005 · $40M
Second opinion±27% typical error
$40.2Mrange $27.8M$46.1M

An independent cross-check of the estimate above for Tanker (segment · size · age · market).

Estimate from $/dwt of similar-size, similar-age ships sold in the last 24 months. Indicative, not a certified valuation.

Risk scoreCritical
25/ 100
Safety48
Compliance5
Environment48
Carbon intensity · estimatedA

This ship has no verified emissions report. We estimate a band A from its segment, size and age (49% confidence).

Estimate, not a reported figure. Within one band 95% of the time on reported peers.

Build Series

Sister Vessels

1 sister
Hanwha Ocean · TANKER · 1999–2000 · 2-hull series

Sister hulls share a yard, segment, build year (±1) and deadweight (±3%) — the cleanest comparables for valuation. Derived in-house from our fleet register; coverage is limited to hulls carrying a recorded builder, so a series may be incomplete.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

87/100
High risk80% component coverage

Strong, corroborated adverse evidence — a detention, sanctions exposure or a dark-fleet signal.

PSC detentionsno data
Sanctions exposure100
Dark-fleet signal100
Hull age88
Flag register25

A coverage-weighted blend of the 4 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtMedium confidence
~299,325t at summer draught

Tanker · summer draught 20.07 m · 184.2 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught
14.05 m~188,414 t
15.05 m~206,899 t
16.06 m~225,384 t
17.06 m~243,870 t
18.06 m~262,355 t
19.07 m~280,840 t
20.07 m~299,325 t
Design draught looks implausible for this class and size — the figures above are anchored to it, so treat them with extra caution.

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (deadweight only) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classification
Declared
Tanker
Inferred from size
Tanker

density DWT/GT=1.90 is consistent with declared tanker

DWT/GT 1.9Beam/LOA 0.175Declared type: Crude Oil Tanker

Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Transparency

Risk signals

Behavioural flags raised against this vessel — each shown with the raw evidence behind it. Derived in-house from data we are entitled to publish; informational, not a determination of wrongdoing.

AIS gapcriticalstrength 1.00

Stopped transmitting relative to the live feed front

On Sanctions List
yes
Regimes
OFAC

Method: vessel is on a sanctions list but has never appeared on our live AIS feed. Source: ais_positions (absence) + sanctioned_vessels.

Signals are a current-state view: a flag clears once the vessel stops tripping its detector. These are screening indicators, not a substitute for your own due diligence.

Transparency

Flag history

Every recorded change of registered flag for this vessel. None of these changes matched a risk pattern. Re-flagging is a normal commercial act; this is an informational record, not a determination of wrongdoing.

  1. JapanUnited Kingdom

    Source: Maritime Intelligence.

Flag changes are taken verbatim from the vessel's recorded history; the “flagged” marker is a transparent rule over a public open-registry list and a documented re-flagging cadence, not a substitute for your own due diligence.

Commercial

Voyage Estimate

From 299,325 DWT · ~70 t/day · bunker @ live VLSFO.

Vessel History

Timeline

Owner Change

Ownership transferred from Teekay Corporation to Euronav

Teekay CorporationEuronav
Class Change

Classification society changed from RINA to Bureau Veritas

RINABureau Veritas
Class Change

Classification society changed from Korean Register to Lloyd's Register

Korean RegisterLloyd's Register
Flag Change

Flag changed from Japan to United Kingdom

JapanUnited Kingdom
Built

Vessel delivered from shipyard

Year 1999

Explore More

Similar Vessels

Community

Vessel Comments