
Built by Volgograd shipbuilding plant in 2005
Technical Specifications
Intelligence
Verified reported figure. Band is peer-relative, not official IMO CII.
Compliance
Ship Energy Efficiency Management plan; Technical files and if applicable, monitoring manual; Certificates for master and officers; SOPEP; Certificate for rating for watchkeeping; Fire doors/openings in fire-resisting divisions; Fire control plan; Crew familiarization with Emergency Systems; Fire detection and alarm system; Ready availability of fire fighting equipment; Other MARPOL Annex VI; Seafarers' employment agreement (SEA); Evaluation of crew performance (fire drills)
Port-State-Control detentions.
Composite Risk
Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.
A coverage-weighted blend of the 3 components we could read for this hull; the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.
Estimated
Other · summer draught 3.3 m · 17.2 t per cm immersion
Estimate only: modelled from deadweight (deadweight regression) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.
Commercial
Price it in the Route Planner between any two commercial ports: ballast and laden legs, two fuels at live bunker prices, port and canal costs, the weather on the way, and the TCE set against the market.
Typical Coaster speed and burn. Replace them with the ship's own figures in the planner.
Explore More