TheMaritime.net
Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%Dry Bulk Freight Index2,490 -1.3%Capesize3,538 -2.8%Panamax2,124 +0.7%Dirty Tanker Index1,935 +1.1%Supramax1,668 -0.1%Clean Tanker Index1,280 -1.4%Handysize947 +0.2%
Container Ship🇩🇰 DenmarkActive

ALEXANDER MAERSK

Built by CSBC Corporation, Taiwan in 1998

IMO
9164237
MMSI
219470000
Call Sign
OZRC2

Technical Specifications

Key Figures

Gross Tonnage
14,120GT
Deadweight
17,526DWT
Length Overall
155m
Beam
25m
Draught
8.5m
Year Built
1998

Intelligence

Risk & Sustainability

Risk scoreMedium
64/ 100
Safety48
Compliance95
Environment48
Carbon intensity · 2023D
784t CO₂
AER (CO₂/capacity·nm)
19.3
Fuel burned
252 t
Technical
EEXI (19.6 gCO₂/t·nm)

Verified reported figure. Band is peer-relative, not official IMO CII.

Composite Risk

Risk Score

65/100
Elevated riskLow confidence40% component coverage

Multiple adverse factors, or a hard ship-specific signal, lift this hull above the fleet norm.

PSC detentionsno data
Sanctions exposureno data
Dark-fleet signalno data
Hull age92
Flag register25

A coverage-weighted blend of the 2 components we could read for this hull — the weights renormalise over only the components present, so a thin read is never inflated and a hull is never credited a “safe 0” for a signal it has no row for. This headline is flagged low-confidence (a thin or structural-only read) and should not be treated as a verdict. Higher means riskier. Derived in-house from government-open port-State-control, flag, sanctions and our own vessel data; weight it by the coverage above.

Estimated

Capacity & Classification

Cargo capacity at draughtHigh confidence
~17,526t at summer draught

Container · summer draught 8.5 m · 32.2 t per cm immersion

Estimated intake by draught
5.95 m~9,316 t
6.38 m~10,685 t
6.8 m~12,053 t
7.23 m~13,421 t
7.65 m~14,789 t
8.08 m~16,158 t
8.5 m~17,526 t

Estimate only — modelled from deadweight (hull geometry) using a first-principles hydrostatic model, not measured hydrostatic tables. The design draught it is anchored to is unreliable across the fleet.

Type classification
Declared
Container
Inferred from size
Container

density DWT/GT=1.24 is consistent with declared container

DWT/GT 1.24Beam/LOA 0.161Declared type: Container Ship

Declared type is consistent with the class implied by the vessel’s size signals. Inferred via our shared size-based classifier.

Commercial

Voyage Estimate

From 17,526 DWT · ~17 t/day · bunker @ live VLSFO.

Explore More

Similar Vessels

Community

Vessel Comments